Unhide the request_headers_to_add, response_headers_to_add, and response_headers_to_remove fields in ClusterWeight. Update HTTP conn manager docs related to same.
Doc update for envoyproxy/envoy#2765.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Zuercher stephan@turbinelabs.io
This enables generating generic service stubs for all the data-plane-api
proto services when generating Java classes with protoc.
This is generally not needed when implementing a gRPC server but in our case we're implementing
it behind our legacy protobuf RPC framework which rely on these stubs. As far as I know the only negative
with enabling these is generating some potentially unnecessary Java classes.
Signed-off-by: Snow Pettersen <snowp@squareup.com>
v2 api changes: Use oneof to specify header match options, based on value(exact_match), regex or range.
The existing value and regex fields will be deprecated. Use the header_match_specfier oneof instead.
Add a new range.proto (envoy.type.v2) for the range type definition.
The SInt64Range message is defined in envoy.type.v2 range.proto.
It consists of start and end (inclusive, exclusive) sint64 values.
v1 api: Add a range_match object to the route headers json. Presence of this object indicates range based route match.
Example: For the below route config:
{
"prefix": "/",
"cluster": "PartitionB",
"name": "PartitionKey",
"range_match": { "start": 0, "end": 10}
}
In the incoming request, if the PartitionKey header value = 0, route match succeeds. Route match fails if the header value = 10, -10, "somestring".
This feature can be used for request routing with Service Fabric stateful services, to route to the desired partition with the [ranged partitioning scheme](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/service-fabric/service-fabric-concepts-partitioning#ranged-partitioning-scheme)
Signed-off-by: Kavya Kotacherry <kavyako@microsoft.com>
this patch adds support for dynamically generating redirect msg based on
a request received by modifying the matched prefix or path.
ref: envoyproxy/envoy#2343
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Balasubramanian <bmadhavan@ebay.com>
I went through and reorganized things to make the v2 docs more
human browsable. I also did a few misc cleanups. There is a lot
more to do here which I'm hoping to find a contractor to pay to
work on, but this is a step in the right direction.
Signed-off-by: Matt Klein <mklein@lyft.com>
There are several main changes in this PR:
Create envoy.api.v2.core packages to break circular dependencies from xDS on to subpackages on to base protos.
Create individual packages for each filter and add independent versioning to each filter.
Add visibility constraints to prevent formation of dependency cycles.
Add gogoproto annotations to improve go code generation.
After moving xDS service definitions and top-level resource protos back to envoy.core.api.v2, cycles were created, since the second-level definitions depend on base protobuf definitions, and are in turn included from xDS; however xDS and base definitions are in the same package.
The solution is to split the base protos into another package, envoy.api.v2.core. That eliminates dependency cycles (validated using go-control-plane).
Added a few gogoproto annotations to improve golang code generation.
Signed-off-by: Kuat Yessenov <kuat@google.com>
Update documentation to match implementation in envoyproxy/envoy#2440.
Makes the WeightedCluster.total_weight field visible in documentation. Update ClusterWeight.weight and traffic shaping document to match.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Zuercher <stephan@turbinelabs.io>
These were lost in my backlog. Required a PGV fix for cross-package enum
validation to deal with the TODOs, see
https://github.com/lyft/protoc-gen-validate/issues/42.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
This is code movement only and no other changes. There should be
no namespace changes or effects to consumers.
Signed-off-by: Matt Klein <mklein@lyft.com>
* Added PGV C++ generation support. This (hopefully temporarily)
abandons using native proto_library in favor of pgv_cc_proto_library.
We maintain build support for proto_library for the glorious future in
which we write a Bazel aspect to run PGV against the native
proto_library shadow graph.
* Replace min_len with min_bytes on strings, until PGV gets not-empty or
min_len support for C++.
* Various fixups for places where the PGV plugin objected to
annotations.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
1) Do RDS other than rate limit. This is large enough will do that next.
2) Manually order top level in v2 with better titles
3) Random other fixes
Note also that I'm going to manually reorder the protos in some cases in a
follow up so the docs make a bit more sense for a casual reader.
Signed-off-by: Matt Klein <mklein@lyft.com>
This patch adds an overview page introduced the v2 API concepts via a
worked example. Brought in the entire transitive dep set of protos from
bootstrap.proto, none of these have been cleaned up beyond the minimum
required to have them build under Sphinx.
Also added the ability to link to the underlying proto in messages/enums
from protodoc.py generated RST.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
This PR just fixes enough stuff to get the HTTP connection manager filter
docs building. I want to get this out as it conflicts with other inflight
PRs and some of the work can be split up. E.g., access logging with that
in flight PR.
Signed-off-by: Matt Klein <mklein@lyft.com>
Turns out that files with just service methods don't get loaded into the
descriptor pool automatically in C++. So, needed to have some messages
in ads.proto. Turns out this was a good opportunity to move some of the
messages that were related to discovery out of base.proto.
This shouldn't break the API, since everything is in the envoy.api.v2
packge space.
* rds: add source IP and (generated) cookie hash policies.
There is room to grow the affinity policy now to arbitrary hashing on
connection properties (e.g. 3 tuple, 5 tuple, etc.) but we only care
about source IP address today.
Fixes#69.
* Clarify TTL wording.
* Document passive vs. generated cookie affinity behaviors.
Rename ForwardAction to RouteAction as requests are not really "forwarded". There is fair amount of mutation, traffic splitting, neither of which implies "forwarding". c.f. Istio route rules.
Yuval Kohavi
Matt Klein
Stephan Zuercher
Bala Madhavan
Snow Pettersen
Kavya Kotacherry - MSFT
Jamie Hewland
Kuat
mandarjog
Brian Pane
htuch
Piotr Sikora
alyssawilk
jwfang
ccaraman
akonradi
Jose Ulises Nino Rivera
Gary Brown
Neri Marschik
Shriram Rajagopalan
tschroed