This PR avoids having to include an API type database in the Envoy build
by introducing a message annotation option that allows Envoy to
determine earlier corresponding message types via descriptor inspection.
The ApiTypeDb is now ApiTypeOracle and utilizes these annotations.
Risk level: Low
Testing: Existing API and verison upgrade tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 297f7a73b3f93bccf8af73c0a555ae52bce6cecb
As part of #8082, we want to be able to (1) automatically generate BUILD
files and (2) treat packages as atomic from a "upgrade / do not upgrade"
decision perspective. This is simplified by having our BUILD targets at
package granularity, since this is what the protoxform plugin operates
on.
This PR broadens the package-level treatment that was already introduced
for Go in #8003 to Python and C++. This simplifies BUILD files
significantly and opens the way to automated generation.
There is some technical debt introduced, since all visibility controls
have been removed. This is slated for reintroduction in
https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/issues/8491.
As a bonus (useful for BUILD file generation), also removed the
inconsistency in BUILD package target naming for packages in envoy.api.*
and envoy.type.*. E.g. //envoy/api/v2:v2 is now //envoy/api/v2:pkg.
Risk level: Low (but this will break internal builds and require BUILD
fixups to consuming projects).
Testing: bazel test //test/... @envoy_api//...
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 4e858f17fe08224c9c089240908ccd0c518e01a7
* [#not-implemented-warn:] was barely used and its purposes are better
served by [#not-implemented-hide:].
* [#proto-status:] was there for an earlier style of versioning, where
APIs were "frozen" or "draft", etc. Now we have semantic versioning
and a regular API clock as per #6271.
Part of #8371.
Risk level: Low (docs only).
Testing: Docs rebuild.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 2c4b6f2b3d614a15f312e34f4664ebeb96d07d12
These were missed in #8125.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 1b3b4ae1180b67bee6395fab5c075896fb1964ec
This patch establishes a v3alpha baseline API, by doing a simple copy of
v2[alpha] dirs and some sed-style heuristic fixups of BUILD dependencies
and proto package namespaces.
The objective is provide a baseline which we can compare the output from
tooling described in #8083 in later PRs, providing smaller visual diffs.
The core philosophy of the API migration is that every step will be
captured in a script (at least until the last manual steps),
api/migration/v3alpha.sh. This script will capture deterministic
migration steps, allowing v2[alpha] to continue to be updated until we
finalize v3.
There is likely to be significant changes, e.g. in addition to the work
scoped for v3, we might want to reduce the amount of API churn by
referring back to v2 protos where it makes sense. This will be done via
tooling in later PRs.
Part of #8083.
Risk level: Low
Testing: build @envoy_api//...
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 085d72b490c124a02849812798f5513a8df9ae72
* api: add proto options for java
* add ci for checking proto options
Signed-off-by: Penn (Dapeng) Zhang <zdapeng@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 02659d411332e9f20d229f482931c15304ea17fd
Renaming message types in api/envoy/service/discovery/v2/hds.proto to improve readability
Risk Level:
Low
This is for #1310.
Signed-off-by: Lilika Markatou <lilika@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 9b33c49d1ca32e73d761849a617b988ed6b596a7
This enables generating generic service stubs for all the data-plane-api
proto services when generating Java classes with protoc.
This is generally not needed when implementing a gRPC server but in our case we're implementing
it behind our legacy protobuf RPC framework which rely on these stubs. As far as I know the only negative
with enabling these is generating some potentially unnecessary Java classes.
Signed-off-by: Snow Pettersen <snowp@squareup.com>
There are several main changes in this PR:
Create envoy.api.v2.core packages to break circular dependencies from xDS on to subpackages on to base protos.
Create individual packages for each filter and add independent versioning to each filter.
Add visibility constraints to prevent formation of dependency cycles.
Add gogoproto annotations to improve go code generation.
After moving xDS service definitions and top-level resource protos back to envoy.core.api.v2, cycles were created, since the second-level definitions depend on base protobuf definitions, and are in turn included from xDS; however xDS and base definitions are in the same package.
The solution is to split the base protos into another package, envoy.api.v2.core. That eliminates dependency cycles (validated using go-control-plane).
Added a few gogoproto annotations to improve golang code generation.
Signed-off-by: Kuat Yessenov <kuat@google.com>
We can dynamically discover service/method descriptors in Envoy, so we
don't need to generate any C++ stubs for this. This simplifies the
Google import and removes an unnecessary build output.