This takes us to the point where address.proto format in a style fairly
similar to the existing docs. There's some missing bits, e.g. oneof/enum
support, nested messages, optional/required, these will come as later
PRs.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
Mostly Bazel hacking to get a protoc plugin running against the
proto_library graph. The Python plugin doesn't actually do any RST
generation yet, it just runs against each file and dumps the input
proto.
The tool can be run with:
bazel build //api --aspects \
tools/protodoc/protodoc.bzl%proto_doc_aspect --output_groups=rst
There's a snafu with unsandboxed runs in CI, where I can only get it to
work on direct leaf invocations, will fix this in a followup PR.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
This PR follows thru on https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/issues/1873
on the data-plane-api side.
Also, update the Python validation script and added a test to ensure
this is captured in CI to avoid future bit rot.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
This is useful in Travis CI (and also internally at Google in our CI) to
validate basic build/link of the protos.
This exposed a small issue with API compatibility. Since we don't have
additional package namespaces for each individual API, there was a
conflict between the RateLimit mesage in RLDS and RDS. The quick fix was
to move the RLDS message inside the response object (this is fine as
nobody is using the v2 RLDS yet, open to alternatives including per-xDS
API namespaces).
htuch
Shriram Rajagopalan
Matt Klein