Fixes#7982
Defines a package level proto library and its associated internal go_proto_library.
Deletes all existing api_go_proto_library, api_go_grpc_library, and go_package annotations in protos (they are not required and pollute the sources).
I deliberately avoided touching anything under udpa since it's being moved to another repository.
Risk Level: low
Testing: build completes
Signed-off-by: Kuat Yessenov <kuat@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ d504fde0ffd97017d1ddff8caa9a3b46bba9ae48
* api: add proto options for java
* add ci for checking proto options
Signed-off-by: Penn (Dapeng) Zhang <zdapeng@google.com>
Mirrored from https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy @ 02659d411332e9f20d229f482931c15304ea17fd
This enables generating generic service stubs for all the data-plane-api
proto services when generating Java classes with protoc.
This is generally not needed when implementing a gRPC server but in our case we're implementing
it behind our legacy protobuf RPC framework which rely on these stubs. As far as I know the only negative
with enabling these is generating some potentially unnecessary Java classes.
Signed-off-by: Snow Pettersen <snowp@squareup.com>
There are several main changes in this PR:
Create envoy.api.v2.core packages to break circular dependencies from xDS on to subpackages on to base protos.
Create individual packages for each filter and add independent versioning to each filter.
Add visibility constraints to prevent formation of dependency cycles.
Add gogoproto annotations to improve go code generation.
After moving xDS service definitions and top-level resource protos back to envoy.core.api.v2, cycles were created, since the second-level definitions depend on base protobuf definitions, and are in turn included from xDS; however xDS and base definitions are in the same package.
The solution is to split the base protos into another package, envoy.api.v2.core. That eliminates dependency cycles (validated using go-control-plane).
Added a few gogoproto annotations to improve golang code generation.
Signed-off-by: Kuat Yessenov <kuat@google.com>
In support of https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/issues/2200 and some
Google internal needs, we are planning on adding support to Envoy to
allow a configuration (or possibly build) driven decision on whether to
using the existing Envoy in-built Grpc::AsyncClient or
the Google C++ gRPC client library (https://grpc.io/grpc/cpp/index.html).
To move in this direction, the idea is we have the xDS ApiConfigSources,
rate limit service config and other filter configurations point at a
GrpcService object. This can be configured to use an Envoy cluster,
where Grpc::AsyncClient will orchestrate communication, or to contain
the config needed to establish a channel in Google C++ gRPC client
library.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
data-plane-api(CircleCI)
Snow Pettersen
Kuat
ramaraochavali
htuch
alyssawilk