For some reason, ASN1_STRING_print was not in the same file as
ASN1_STRING_print_ex, but X509_print. Although it also behaves very
differently from ASN1_STRING_print_ex, so that's a little interesting.
Change-Id: I3f88f8943c8e36426eedafa7e350a787881d0c74
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48775
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We've never tested this and plenty of files depend on FILE* APIs without
ifdefs.
Change-Id: I8c51c043e068b30bdde1723c3810d3e890eabfca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48771
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Actually making crypto/asn1 and crypto/x509 const-correct will be a tall
order, between all the hidden caches, non-const ASN.1 macros, and
ambiguity between mutable and immutable getters. But upstream
const-corrected a number of things, so align with them. (In particular,
it is not currently possible to usefully use a non-const X509_NAME.)
I think I've gotten most of x509.h. I started going through x509v3.h,
but all the conf bits take non-const char* pointers, which shows up in
the public (but probably unused) X509V3_CONF_METHOD, so I've left it
alone in this CL.
For some reason, OpenSSL made X509_get_subject_name a const-to-non-const
function but kept X509_get_serialNumber uniformly non-const while adding
a uniformly const X509_get0_serialNumber. I've just mirrored this for
compatibility's sake.
Change-Id: Ia33a7576165cf2da5922807fc065f1f114b0f84c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/42584
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley