Also use a slightly more conservative pattern. Instead of aligning the
pointer as a uintptr_t and casting back, compute the offset and advance
in pointer space. C guarantees that casting from pointer to uintptr_t
and back gives the same pointer, but general integer-to-pointer
conversions are generally implementation-defined. GCC does define it in
the useful way, but this makes fewer dependencies.
Change-Id: I70c7af735e892fe7a8333b78b39d7b1f3f1cdbef
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48405
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
We have loads of variations of these. Align them in one set. This avoids
the HOST_* macros defined by md32_common.h, so it'll be a little easier
to make it a more conventional header.
Change-Id: Id47fe7b51a8f961bd87839f8146d8a5aa8027aa6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46425
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's now 2021. Hopefully we can at least assume anyone building with
-std=c11 also has a corresponding set of headers. Plus, even if you
don't, Clang seems to provide a header. (So C11 atomics work in
clang-cl.) Also apparently atomics are optional, so this checks
__STDC_NO_ATOMICS__.
This does *not* set C11 as the minimum version. If you build with
-std=c99, we'll silently use the non-atomics implementation. That's a
little magical, so I've kept OPENSSL_C11_ATOMIC as a way to assert that
you really want C11 atomics. Mostly it turns into a -std=c11 && !MSVC
self-assert.
Update-Note: If something fails to compile, we'll revert this and adjust
the check, or add an opt-out, or give up. Also, if building with
-std=c99, consider -std=c11.
Change-Id: I1a8074c367a765c5a0f087db8c250e050df2dde8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46344
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In order to provide evidence to auditors that high-level functions end
up calling into the FIPS module, provide counters that allow for such
monitoring.
Change-Id: I55d45299f3050bf58077715ffa280210db156116
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46124
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley