GCC has a warning that complains about even more type mismatches in
printf. Some of these are a bit messy and will be fixed in separate CLs.
This covers the easy ones.
The .*s stuff is unfortunate, but printf has no size_t-clean string
printer. ALPN protocol lengths are bound by uint8_t, so it doesn't
really matter.
The IPv6 printing one is obnoxious and arguably a false positive. It's
really a C language flaw: all types smaller than int get converted to
int when you do arithmetic. So something like this first doesn't
overflow the shift because it computes over int, but then the result
overall is stored as an int.
uint8_t a, b;
(a << 8) | b
On the one hand, this fixes a "missing" cast to uint16_t before the
shift. At the same time, the incorrect final type means passing it to
%x, which expects unsigned int. The compiler has forgotten this value
actually fits in uint16_t and flags a warning. Mitigate this by storing
in a uint16_t first.
The story doesn't quite end here. Arguments passed to variadic functions
go through integer promotion[0], so the argument is still passed to
snprintf as an int! But then va_arg allows for a signedness mismatch[1],
provided the value is representable in both types. The combination means
that %x, though actually paired with unsigned, also accept uint8_t and
uint16_t, because those are guaranteed to promote to an int that meets
[1]. GCC recognizes [1] applies here.
(There's also PRI16x, but that's a bit tedious to use and, in glibc, is
defined as plain "x" anyway.)
[0] https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/conversion#Default_argument_promotions
[1] https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/variadic/va_arg
Bug: 450
Change-Id: Ic1d41356755a18ab922956dd2e07b560470341f4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50765
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ASN1_ENCODING can be unexported because all types using it are now
hidden. This does mean external uses of <openssl/asn1t.h> can no longer
use ASN1_SEQUENCE_enc, but there do not seem to be any such uses.
ASN1_TLC and ASN1_TEMPLATE typedefs are only necessary for users of
asn1t.h. I'm hopeful we can do away with ASN1_TLC once I get to
reworking tasn_dec.c. ASN1_TEMPLATE is somewhat stuck, though all
references should be hidden behind macros.
ASN1_generate_* appear to only referenced within the library. Remove the
unused one and move the other to x509/internal.h. (asn1_gen.c is
currently in crypto/x509 rather than crypto/asn1, so I put it in
x509/internal.h to match. I'll leave figuring out that file to later.)
Annoyingly, asn1/internal.h now pulls in asn1t.h, but so it goes.
Change-Id: I8b43de3fa9647883103006e27907730d5531fd7d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50106
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
See upstream commits:
32f3b98d1302d4c0950dc1bf94b50269b6edbd95
432f8688bb72e21939845ac7a69359ca718c6676
7bb50cbc4af78a0c8d36fdf2c141ad1330125e2f
8c74c9d1ade0fbdab5b815ddb747351b8b839641
Change-Id: Iff614260c1b1582856edb4ae7a226f2e07537698
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/49045
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
See also 174ba8048a7f2f5e1fca31cfb93b1730d9db8300 from upstream. This
differs from the upstream CL in that:
- We don't silently drop trailing NULs.
- As a NUL-terminated C string, the empty string is a non-NULL pointer
to an array containing a zero byte. Use the latter consistently.
Change-Id: I99c6c4c26be5a1771c56c6ab356425f1b85be41d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/49006
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
At one point in the SSLeay days, all the ASN1_STRING typedefs were
separate structs (but only in debug builds) and the M_ASN1_* macros
included type casts to handle this.
This is long gone, but we still have the M_ASN1_* macros. Remove the
casts and switch code within the library to call the macros. Some
subtleties:
- The "MSTRING" types (what OpenSSL calls its built-in CHOICEs
containing some set of string types) are weird because the M_FOO_new()
macro and the tasn_new.c FOO_new() function behave differently. I've
split those into a separate CL.
- ASN1_STRING_type, etc., call into the macro, which accesses the field
directly. This CL inverts the dependency.
- ASN1_INTEGER_new and ASN1_INTEGER_free, etc., are generated via
IMPLEMENT_ASN1_STRING_FUNCTIONS in tasn_typ.c. I've pointed
M_ASN1_INTEGER_new and M_ASN1_INTEGER_free to these fields. (The free
function is a no-op, but consistent.)
- The other macros like M_ASN1_BIT_STRING_dup largely do not have
corresponding functions. I've aligned with OpenSSL in just using the
generic ASN1_STRING_dup function. But some others, like
M_ASN1_OCTET_STRING_dup have a corresponding ASN1_OCTET_STRING_dup
function. OpenSSL retained these, so I have too.
Update-Note: Some external code uses the M_ASN1_* macros. This should
remain compatible, but some type errors may have gotten through
unnoticed. This CL restores type-checking.
Change-Id: I8656abc7d0f179192e05a852c97483c021ad9b20
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44045
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
See 309e73dfe067b3b774ef6f57bf665f41373a81ca from upstream, though note
that v3_alt.c's fix was rewritten. (We don't have sk_reserve, and I
don't think their fix was quite right anyway.)
Change-Id: Ieabd19d87d4628658324b212cce2ed3ce451ad22
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/43284
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley