This allows operating systems to insist on IBT
enforcement as an exploit mitigation mechanism without
needing to make an exception for anything using a
bundled boringssl, such as chrome, mono, and qtwebengine.
Change-Id: Iac28dd3d2af177b89ffde10ae97bce23739feb94
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/60625
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Trying to migrate Chromium to the "link all the asm files together"
strategy broke the aarch64 Android build because some of the ifdef'd out
assembly files were missing the .note.gnu.property section for BTI. If
we add support for IBT, that'll be another one.
To fix this, introduce <openssl/asm_base.h>, which must be included at
the start of every assembly file (before the target ifdefs). This does a
couple things:
- It emits BTI and noexecstack markers into every assembly file, even
those that ifdef themselves out.
- It resolves the MSan -> OPENSSL_NO_ASM logic, so we only need to do it
once.
- It defines the same OPENSSL_X86_64, etc., defines we set elsewhere, so
we can ensure they're consistent.
This required carving files up a bit. <openssl/base.h> has a lot of
things, such that trying to guard everything in it on __ASSEMBLER__
would be tedious. Instead, I moved the target defines to a new
<openssl/target.h>. Then <openssl/asm_base.h> is the new header that
pulls in all those things.
Bug: 542
Change-Id: I1682b4d929adea72908655fa1bb15765a6b3473b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/60765
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I did not have "find a bug in the assembler" on my bingo card today, but
here we are.
NASM 2.15, prior to 2.15.04, has a bug where, if a section that already
exists is referenced again with alignment qualifiers, it incorrect adds
padding and mangles the output. See
https://bugzilla.nasm.us/show_bug.cgi?id=3392701.
Work around this by suppressing the perlasm-emitted qualifiers the
second time a section is emitted. We likely don't need these qualifiers
because, for all sections we care about, NASM's defaults are fine, but
perlasm tries to align .text more aggressively than the default, so let
it do that.
Bug: chromium:1422018
Change-Id: Iade5702c139b70772d4957a83c8f9be86c8af97c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/57825
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Various constants and strings identifying the authors are currently
misplaced in .text. This change allows using execute-only .text on
platforms that enforce it by default, such as OpenBSD.
Modify x86_64-xlate.pl to replace .rodata with __DATA,__const for macs.
Adapt the nasm/masm path to emit an .rdata segment with alignment of 8.
This last change is not strictly needed but makes things explicit.
Change-Id: If716b892c1faabd85c6c70bdd75e145304841f83
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/57445
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We no longer have a need to support ppc64le, nor do we have any testing
story for the assembly we previously had. Remove all ppc64le-specific
assembly.
This CL stops short of removing it from base.h. That'll be done in a
follow-up CL, just to separate which removals are for the assembly and
which removals remove all support.
Update-Note: After this change, ppc64le builds drop assembly
optimizations and will fallback to a generic C-based AES implementation.
Change-Id: Ic8075638085761d66cebc276eb16c4770ce03920
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/56388
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If you pass an empty assembly file into nasm, it crashes. Add a dummy
instruction which the static linker will hopefully dropped. (This is a
no-op unless you try to link all the assembly files together for a
simpler build.)
Bug: 542
Change-Id: Idd2b96c129a3a39d5f21e3905762cc34c720f6b2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/56326
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This implements similar directives as MASM, so we do not need to build
all the structures by hand. It does not provide any help to abstract
between Win64 and SysV differences, however.
This is pulled together from some old draft CLs I had, one of which
actually synthesized CFI directives from SEH, so it should be possible.
I've intentionally omitted that however, as it also brings in questions
about how to handle the calling convention differences (the existing
machinery won't *quite* work). I've uploaded just this for now, so
review can focus on the basic mechanism.
I've also preserved perlasm's weird mixed tabs and spaces indentation
convention for now, though it is a bit tedious.
Bug: 259
Change-Id: Ib3f46a27751a5319b758d12c462c660cf9f3e632
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/56126
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is purely cosmetic, but makes it consistent with the DW, etc.,
lines in the block above. The SEH unwind code support will emit a mix of
DW and DB directives and this makes them look more consistent.
Bug: 259
Change-Id: Ia16166ab2495aa813d6076d55af5b62511933c28
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/56125
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
For the C files, rather than force the caller to juggle
crypto_linux_sources, etc., we just wrap the whole file in ifdefs and
ask the callers to link everything together.
Assembly is typically built by a different tool, so we have less room
here. However, there are really only two families of tools we care
about: gas (which runs the C preprocessor) and nasm (which has its own
preprocessor). Callers should be able to limit themselves to
special-casing Windows x86(_64) for NASM and then pass all the remaining
assembly files to their gas-like tool. File-wide ifdefs can take care of
the rest.
We're almost set up to allow this, except the files condition on
architecture, but not OS. Add __ELF__, __APPLE__, and _WIN32 conditions
as appropriate.
One subtlety: the semantics of .note.GNU-stack are that *any* unmarked
object file makes the stack executable. (In current GNU ld. lld doesn't
have this issue, and GNU ld claims they'll remove it in a later
release.) Empirically, this doesn't seem to apply to empty object files
but, to be safe, we should ensure all object files have the marking.
That leads to a second subtlety: on targets where @ is a comment,
@progbits is spelled %progbits, per [0]. If we want all .S files to work
in all targets, that includes these markers. Fortunately, %progbits
appears to work universally (see [1], [2], [3], [4]), so I've just
switched us to that spelling.
I've also tightened up the __arm__ and __aarch64__ checks to __ARMEL__
and __AARCH64EL__. We don't support big-endian Arm (or any other
platform) and, even if we did, the conditions in the assembly files
should match the conditions in the C files that pull them in.
This CL doesn't change our build to take advantage of this (though I'll
give it a go later), just makes it possible for builds to do it.
[0] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/Section.html
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-crypto/patch/20170119212805.18049-1-dvlasenk@redhat.com/#20050285
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92820#c11
[3] https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/gdb-patches/2016-01/msg00319.html
[4] de990b270d
Bug: 542
Change-Id: I0a8ded24423087c0da13bd0335cbd757d4eee65a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/55626
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We generate .S files for assembly, which means they run through the C
preprocessor first. In gas targets where # is the comment marker, there
is a conflict with cpp directives.
The comments actually rely on #This and #source not being directives. If
I begin a line with "if", the build fails. Since the C preprocessor is
responsible for removing C preprocessor comments, we should be able to
safely use // everywhere with less ambiguity.
(In fact, we were already relying on this for 32-bit ARM. The 32-bit ARM
gas line comment marker is @. 64-bit ARM uses //, and x86/x86_64/ppc64
use #.)
This reportedly causes issues for goma. See
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/boringssl/issues/detail?id=448#c3
Bug: 448
Change-Id: Ib58f3152691c1dbcccfc045f21f486b56824283d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/49965
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Windows on Arm (WoA) builds are currently using the C implementations
of the various functions within BoringSSL. This patch enables feature
detection for the Neon and hardware crypto optimizations, and updates
the perl script to generate AArch64 .S files for WoA.
Note these files use GNU assembler syntax (specifically tested with
Clang assembler), not armasm.
Change-Id: Id8841f4db0498ec16215095a4e6bd60d427cd54b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/43304
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Imported from upstream's 617b49db14fa4c1211bfc5d0e88294d0f159c9a9.
Change-Id: I64349b7cbbda8fbacf1e20ca609081ed42f10550
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44565
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
As of
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/tools/build/+/2586225,
we no longer test on Yasm. Yasm hasn't seen a release for over six years
now and is missing support for newer x86 instructions.
This removes the remnants of support for Yasm on the CI. It also removes
the Yasm support we patched into x86nasm.pl, which removes a now
unnecessary divergence from upstream.
Update-Note: If a x86 Windows asm build breaks, switch from Yasm to
NASM. We're also no longer testing NASM on x86_64 Windows, but there
wasn't any patch to revert.
Change-Id: I016bad8757fcc13240db9f56dd622be518e649d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44564
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
David Benjamin
Bob Beck
Theo Buehler
Anthony Roberts
Adam Langley