We have no X509_REQ_up_ref function, and neither does OpenSSL. That
means this reference count is unreachable, so remove it.
Change-Id: I6a0899b8fcb0716d47c89174b561e90d99a9b54b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/53306
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This CL is the result of the following commands:
for d in asn1 x509 x509v3 pem; do
go run util/convert_comments.go crypto/$d/*.h
go run util/convert_comments.go crypto/$d/*.c
done
Change-Id: If78433f68cb2f913b0de06ded744a5a65540e1cf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/53087
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
This CL runs the same command as in the preceding CL, but with
'IncludeBraces: true' added to .clang-format. I've split this out
separately because the documentation says:
> Setting this option to true could lead to incorrect code formatting
> due to clang-format’s lack of complete semantic information. As such,
> extra care should be taken to review code changes made by this option.
I've also kept InsertBraces out of .clang-format for now because it's a
fairly recent option, and clang-format fails when it sees unrecognized
options.
Change-Id: I305ea7bb2633704053a1f8de1e11b037b9fc8a76
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/53086
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Previously, we did not clang-format a few directories because we had
left them largely untouched. clang-format them now so we're finally more
uniform.
This CL is the result of the following commands:
for d in asn1 x509 x509v3 pem; do
clang-format -i crypto/$d/*.h
clang-format -i crypto/$d/*.c
done
(Written in this funny way because crypto/pem/*.h doesn't match
anything.)
Change-Id: I7f4ca9b3a9c8f07d6556e00e9e84b3c0880ee12e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/53085
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Adding the ending macros to StatementMacros tells clang-format the macro
terminates a statement. Adding trailing commas in the middle keeps it
from trying to bundle the curly brace with the next statement.
Also add a few other trailing commas that clang-format otherwise indents
awkwardly.
Change-Id: I0b2ba9cf07bc775649fa1e92de3e5bb2e2b0b20b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/52728
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
This aligns X509_REQ's and X509_CRL's parsers to the changes already
made with X509; we reject invalid versions and check that extensions are
only with the corresponding version. For now, we still allow X509v1 CRLs
with an explicit version, matching certificates. (The DEFAULT question
is moot for X509_REQ because CSRs always encode their version, see RFC
2986.)
In addition to rejecting garbage, this allows for a more efficient
representation once we stop using the table-based parser: X509 and
X509_CRL can just store a small enum. X509_REQ doesn't need to store
anything because the single version is information-less.
Update-Note: Invalid CRL and CSR versions will no longer be accepted.
X509_set_version, etc., no longer allow invalid versions.
Fixed: 467
Change-Id: I33f3aec747d8060ab80e0cbb8ddf97672e07642c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/52605
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This fix isn't ideal, given the current space of possible version
values. But rather than make the printing code complicated, we should
make invalid versions impossible. I've left TODOs where that would be
needed.
Bug: 467, 450
Change-Id: I6c9ae97b8454182b0c1ab6ba2e070dc6d7d8b3f4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50767
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We can unexport the X509_REQ_INFO type entirely. (NB: OpenSSL hasn't
done this, but has unexported so much of X509_REQ_INFO that it is
impossible to use what remains anyway.)
Update-Note: Callers that reach into X509_REQ and X509_REQ_INFO must use
accessors instead.
Change-Id: I1eea5207b9195c8051d5e467acd63ad5f0caf89d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47564
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley