We have loads of variations of these. Align them in one set. This avoids
the HOST_* macros defined by md32_common.h, so it'll be a little easier
to make it a more conventional header.
Change-Id: Id47fe7b51a8f961bd87839f8146d8a5aa8027aa6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46425
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's a little confusing to have load_word_le but actually use size_t
instead of crypto_word_t.
NOTE: on some platforms, notably NaCl, crypto_word_t is larger than
size_t. (Do we still need to support this?) We don't have a good testing
story here, so I tested it by hacking up a 32-bit x86 build to think it
was OPENSSL_64_BIT.
Change-Id: Ia0ce469e86803f22655fe2d9659a6a5db766429f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46424
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
See also 8129ac6ac4c0ca3a488c225cde580ede7dabe874 and
81198bf323ea9deda907714170d329ca7d2ff01f from upstream.
In trying to figure out why ASan (which normally catches overlapping
memcpys) didn't flag this, I noticed that we actually don't have tests
for empty inputs. I've added them to cipher_tests.txt where missing and
fixed a bad assert in ofb.c.
ASan still doesn't flag this because LLVM even requires memcpy handle
dst == src. Still, fixing it is less effort than getting a clear answer
from GCC and MSVC. Though this puts us in the frustrating position of
trying to follow a C rule that our main toolchain and sanitizer disavow.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11763https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993
Change-Id: I53c64a84834ddf5cddca0b3d53a29998f666ea2f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46285
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley