Chiebot-Mirror/boringssl - boringssl - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Adam Langley	2e54edf323	A couple of Aarch64 FIPS delocate fixes. Clang 12 in opt mode produces a couple of assembly patterns that were not handled by delocate. Firstly, two-digit vector indexes were just a simple omission. Fixed. Secondly, Clang puts symbol deltas in .byte directives, and bit-shifts them. The .byte directive was not considered to be a symbol-containing directive because it's too small, but it could store deltas. Additionally, bit-shifting of symbol expressions was not supported. Fixed. Change-Id: I796299821f5ac7d3639fa6243c5d9bd5342bbddf Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47064 Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>	4 years ago
Adam Langley	c5e2cf3c07	delocate: support Aarch64 Add Aarch64 support to delocate. Since it's a modern ISA, it's actually not too bad once I understood the behaviour of the assembler. Change-Id: I105fede43b5196b7ff7bdbf1ee71c6cfa2fc1aab Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44848 Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>	4 years ago
Adam Langley	5d54832f1a	delocate: handle Aarch64 assembly in parser. Aarch64 assembly is quite different from x86-64 or POWER. But the system of directives is the same so there's quite a lot of utility from being able to use the same delocate framework. Unfortunately, with peg, there's no obvious way to be able to parse instructions differently without breaking the parsing into two stages. Thus the parser is extended here to support all three ISAs. This seems to work ok without breaking either of the other two. Change-Id: Iced0f651e556e6ffae3eb35f2edfc0bf84167967 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44846 Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>	4 years ago
Adam Langley	0cd846f24f	delocation: large memory model support. Large memory models on x86-64 allow the code/data of a shared object / executable to be larger than 2GiB. This is typically impossible because x86-64 code frequently uses int32 offsets from RIP. Consider the following program: int getpid(); int main() { return getpid(); } This is turned into the following assembly under a large memory model: .L0$pb: leaq .L0$pb(%rip), %rax movabsq $_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-.L0$pb, %rcx addq %rax, %rcx movabsq $getpid@GOT, %rdx xorl %eax, %eax jmpq (%rcx,%rdx) # TAILCALL And, with relocations: 0: 48 8d 05 f9 ff ff ff lea -0x7(%rip),%rax # 0 <main> 7: 48 b9 00 00 00 00 00 movabs $0x0,%rcx e: 00 00 00 9: R_X86_64_GOTPC64 _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x9 11: 48 01 c1 add %rax,%rcx 14: 48 ba 00 00 00 00 00 movabs $0x0,%rdx 1b: 00 00 00 16: R_X86_64_GOT64 getpid 1e: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax 20: ff 24 11 jmpq (%rcx,%rdx,1) We can see that, in the large memory model, function calls involve loading the address of _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ (using `movabs`, which takes a 64-bit immediate) and then indexing into it. Both cause relocations. If we link the binary and disassemble we get: 0000000000001120 <main>: 1120: 48 8d 05 f9 ff ff ff lea -0x7(%rip),%rax # 1120 <main> 1127: 48 b9 e0 2e 00 00 00 movabs $0x2ee0,%rcx 112e: 00 00 00 1131: 48 01 c1 add %rax,%rcx 1134: 48 ba d8 ff ff ff ff movabs $0xffffffffffffffd8,%rdx 113b: ff ff ff 113e: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax 1140: ff 24 11 jmpq (%rcx,%rdx,1) Thus the _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ symbol is at 0x1120+0x2ee0 = 0x4000. That's the address of the .got.plt section. But the offset “into” the table is -0x40, putting it at 0x3fd8, in .got: Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn 18 .got 00000030 0000000000003fd0 0000000000003fd0 00002fd0 23 19 .got.plt 00000018 0000000000004000 0000000000004000 00003000 2*3 And, indeed, there's a dynamic relocation to setup that address: OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0000000000003fd8 R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT getpid@GLIBC_2.2.5 Accessing data or BSS works the same: the address of the variable is stored relative to _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_. This is a bit of a pain because we want to delocate the module into a single .text segment so that it moves through linking unaltered. If we took the obvious path and built our own offset table then it would need to contain absolute addresses, but they are only available at runtime and .text segments aren't supposed to be run-time patched. (That's why .rela.dyn is a separate segment.) If we use a different segment then we have the same problem as with the original offset table: the offset to the segment is unknown when compiling the module. Trying to pattern match this two-step lookup to do extensive rewriting seems fragile: I'm sure the compilers will move things around and interleave other work in time, if they don't already. So, in order to handle movabs trying to load _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ we define a symbol in the same segment, but outside of the hashed region of the module, that contains the offset from that position to _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_: .boringssl_got_delta: .quad _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-.boringssl_got_delta Then a movabs of $_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-.Lfoo turns into: movq .boringssl_got_delta(%rip), %destreg addq $.boringssl_got_delta-.Lfoo, %destreg This works because it's calculating _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ - got_delta + (got_delta - .Lfoo) When that value is added to .Lfoo, as the original code will do, the correct address results. Also it doesn't need an extra register because we know that 32-bit offsets are sufficient for offsets within the module. As for the offsets within the offset table, we have to load them from locations outside of the hashed part of the module to get the relocations out of the way. Again, no extra registers are needed. Change-Id: I87b19a2f8886bd9f7ac538fd55754e526bcf3097 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/42324 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>	5 years ago
Adam Langley	fb0c05cac2	acvp: add CMAC-AES support. Change by Dan Janni. Change-Id: I3f059e7b1a822c6f97128ca92a693499a3f7fa8f Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/41984 Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>	5 years ago