Upstream ultimately preferred a different naming convention, and
type-specific constants. Align with them.
Update-Note: This renames some BoringSSL-specific constants that we
recently added. It doesn't look like anyone's used them yet.
Change-Id: I580e0872a5f09fb1c5bab9127c35f1ed852680c0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47164
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Update-Note: Direct accesses of X509_PUBKEY should be replaced with one
of the accessors. I believe all callers have been fixed at this point.
Change-Id: Ib325782867478fb548da1bf5ef0023cf989f125b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46944
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The X509 version APIs confuse everyone, including our own tests
(v3name_test.cc was using the wrong value). Introduce constants. Also
document which version to use for each type. It is extra confusing that,
although certificates and CRLs use the same Version enum, RFC5280
defines X.509 v3 certificates with X.509 v2 CRLs. (There are no v3
CRLs.)
I'll send a similar patch to OpenSSL to keep upstream aligned.
Change-Id: If096138eb004156d43df87a6d74f695b04f67480
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/45944
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Update-Note: No one uses this function. It had a NULL dereference in
some error cases. See CVE-2021-23841.
Change-Id: Ie1cc97615ac8b674147715d7d62e62faf218ae65
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/45684
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
At one point in the SSLeay days, all the ASN1_STRING typedefs were
separate structs (but only in debug builds) and the M_ASN1_* macros
included type casts to handle this.
This is long gone, but we still have the M_ASN1_* macros. Remove the
casts and switch code within the library to call the macros. Some
subtleties:
- The "MSTRING" types (what OpenSSL calls its built-in CHOICEs
containing some set of string types) are weird because the M_FOO_new()
macro and the tasn_new.c FOO_new() function behave differently. I've
split those into a separate CL.
- ASN1_STRING_type, etc., call into the macro, which accesses the field
directly. This CL inverts the dependency.
- ASN1_INTEGER_new and ASN1_INTEGER_free, etc., are generated via
IMPLEMENT_ASN1_STRING_FUNCTIONS in tasn_typ.c. I've pointed
M_ASN1_INTEGER_new and M_ASN1_INTEGER_free to these fields. (The free
function is a no-op, but consistent.)
- The other macros like M_ASN1_BIT_STRING_dup largely do not have
corresponding functions. I've aligned with OpenSSL in just using the
generic ASN1_STRING_dup function. But some others, like
M_ASN1_OCTET_STRING_dup have a corresponding ASN1_OCTET_STRING_dup
function. OpenSSL retained these, so I have too.
Update-Note: Some external code uses the M_ASN1_* macros. This should
remain compatible, but some type errors may have gotten through
unnoticed. This CL restores type-checking.
Change-Id: I8656abc7d0f179192e05a852c97483c021ad9b20
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44045
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Actually making crypto/asn1 and crypto/x509 const-correct will be a tall
order, between all the hidden caches, non-const ASN.1 macros, and
ambiguity between mutable and immutable getters. But upstream
const-corrected a number of things, so align with them. (In particular,
it is not currently possible to usefully use a non-const X509_NAME.)
I think I've gotten most of x509.h. I started going through x509v3.h,
but all the conf bits take non-const char* pointers, which shows up in
the public (but probably unused) X509V3_CONF_METHOD, so I've left it
alone in this CL.
For some reason, OpenSSL made X509_get_subject_name a const-to-non-const
function but kept X509_get_serialNumber uniformly non-const while adding
a uniformly const X509_get0_serialNumber. I've just mirrored this for
compatibility's sake.
Change-Id: Ia33a7576165cf2da5922807fc065f1f114b0f84c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/42584
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley