Tag:
Branch:
Tree:
955ef7991e
2214
2272
2311
2357
2490
2564
2623
2661
2704
2785
2883
2924
2987
3029
3071
3112
3202
3239
3282
3359
3538
3945
chromium-2214
chromium-2272
chromium-2311
chromium-2357
chromium-2490
chromium-2564
chromium-2623
chromium-2661
chromium-2704
chromium-2883
chromium-2924
chromium-2987
chromium-3029
chromium-3071
chromium-3112
chromium-3202
chromium-3239
chromium-3282
chromium-3359
chromium-3538
chromium-3945
chromium-5359
chromium-5414
chromium-stable
chromium-stable-with-bazel
esni
fips-20180730
fips-20220613
fips-20230428
fips-20240407
fips-20240805
fips-20250107
fips-android-20191008
grpc-202302
infra/config
main
main-with-bazel
master
master-with-bazel
0.20240913.0
0.20240930.0
0.20241024.0
0.20241203.0
0.20241209.0
0.20250114.0
0.20250212.0
fips-20170615
fips-20180730
fips-20190808
fips-20210429
fips-20220613
fips-android-20191020
version_for_cocoapods_1.0
version_for_cocoapods_10.0
version_for_cocoapods_2.0
version_for_cocoapods_3.0
version_for_cocoapods_4.0
version_for_cocoapods_5.0
version_for_cocoapods_6.0
version_for_cocoapods_7.0
version_for_cocoapods_8.0
version_for_cocoapods_9.0
${ noResults }
4 Commits (955ef7991e41ac6c0ea5114b4b9abb98cc5fd614)
Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
846a22700f |
Switch __ARM_FEATURE_CRYPTO to __ARM_FEATURE_{AES,SHA2}.
The latest version of ACLE splits __ARM_FEATURE_CRYPTO into two defines to reflect that, starting ARMv8.2, the cryptography extension can include {AES,PMULL} and {SHA1,SHA256} separately. Also standardize on __ARM_NEON, which is the recommended symbol from ACLE, and the only one defined on non-Apple aarch64 targets. Digging through GCC history, __ARM_NEON__ is a bit older. __ARM_NEON was added in GCC's 9e94a7fc5ab770928b9e6a2b74e292d35b4c94da from 2012, part of GCC 4.8.0. I suspect we can stop paying attention to __ARM_NEON__ at this point, but I've left both working for now. __ARM_FEATURE_{AES,SHA2} is definite too new to fully replace __ARM_FEATURE_CRYPTO. Tested on Linux that -march=armv8-a+aes now also drops the fallback AES code. Previously, we would pick up -march=armv8-a+crypto, but not -march=armv8-a+aes. Also tested that, on an OPENSSL_STATIC_ARMCAP build, -march=armv8-a+sha2 sets the SHA-1 and SHA-256 features. Change-Id: I749bdbc501ba2da23177ddb823547efcd77e5c98 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50847 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> |
3 years ago |
|
661266ea06 |
Move CPU detection symbols to crypto/internal.h.
These symbols were not marked OPENSSL_EXPORT, so they weren't really usable externally anyway. They're also very sensitive to various build configuration toggles, which don't always get reflected into projects that include our headers. Move them to crypto/internal.h. Change-Id: I79a1fcf0b24e398d75a9cc6473bae28ec85cb835 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50846 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> |
3 years ago |
|
1e15682f1a |
Enable SHA-512 ARM acceleration when available.
This imports the changes to sha512-armv8.pl from upstream's af0fcf7b4668218b24d9250b95e0b96939ccb4d1. Tweaks needed: - Add an explicit .text because we put .LK$BITS in .rodata for XOM - .LK$bits and code are in separate sections, so use adrp/add instead of plain adr - Where glibc needs feature flags to *enable* pthread_rwlock, Apple interprets _XOPEN_SOURCE as a request to *disable* Apple extensions. Tighten the condition on the _XOPEN_SOURCE check. Added support for macOS and Linux, tested manually on an ARM Mac and a VM, respectively. Fuchsia and Windows do not currently have APIs to expose this bit, so I've left in TODOs. Benchmarks from an Apple M1 Max: Before: Did 4647000 SHA-512 (16 bytes) operations in 1000103us (74.3 MB/sec) Did 1614000 SHA-512 (256 bytes) operations in 1000379us (413.0 MB/sec) Did 439000 SHA-512 (1350 bytes) operations in 1001694us (591.6 MB/sec) Did 76000 SHA-512 (8192 bytes) operations in 1011821us (615.3 MB/sec) Did 39000 SHA-512 (16384 bytes) operations in 1024311us (623.8 MB/sec) After: Did 10369000 SHA-512 (16 bytes) operations in 1000088us (165.9 MB/sec) [+123.1%] Did 3650000 SHA-512 (256 bytes) operations in 1000079us (934.3 MB/sec) [+126.2%] Did 1029000 SHA-512 (1350 bytes) operations in 1000521us (1388.4 MB/sec) [+134.7%] Did 175000 SHA-512 (8192 bytes) operations in 1001874us (1430.9 MB/sec) [+132.5%] Did 89000 SHA-512 (16384 bytes) operations in 1010314us (1443.3 MB/sec) [+131.4%] (This doesn't seem to change the overall SHA-256 vs SHA-512 performance question on ARM, when hashing perf matters. SHA-256 on the same chip gets up to 2454.6 MB/s.) In terms of build coverage, for now, we'll have build coverage everywhere and test coverage on Chromium, which runs this code on macOS CI. We should request a macOS ARM64 bot for our standalone CI. Longer term, we need a QEMU-based builder to test various features. QEMU seems to have pretty good coverage of all this, which will at least give us Linux. I haven't added an OPENSSL_STATIC_ARMCAP_SHA512 for now. Instead, we just look at the standard __ARM_FEATURE_SHA512 define. Strangely, the corresponding -march tag is not sha512. Neither GCC and nor Clang have -march=armv8-a+sha512. Instead, -march=armv8-a+sha3 implies both __ARM_FEATURE_SHA3 and __ARM_FEATURE_SHA512! Yet everything else seems to describe the SHA512 extension as separate from SHA3. https://developer.arm.com/architectures/system-architectures/software-standards/acle Update-Note: Consumers with a different build setup may need to limit -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 to Linux or non-Apple platforms. Otherwise, <sys/types.h> won't define some typedef needed by <sys/sysctl.h>. If you see a build error about u_char, etc., being undefined in some system header, that is probably the cause. Change-Id: Ia213d3796b84c71b7966bb68e0aec92e5d7d26f0 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50807 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> |
3 years ago |
|
fb0c05cac2 |
acvp: add CMAC-AES support.
Change by Dan Janni. Change-Id: I3f059e7b1a822c6f97128ca92a693499a3f7fa8f Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/41984 Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> |
5 years ago |