IETF QUIC draft 33 is replacing the TLS extension
codepoint for QUIC transport parameters from 0xffa5
to 57. To support multiple versions of Chrome, we
need to support both codepoints in BoringSSL. This
CL adds support for the new codepoint in a way that
can be enabled on individual connections.
Note that when BoringSSL is not in QUIC mode, it
will error if it sees the new codepoint as a server
but it will ignore the legacy codepoint as that could
be a different private usage of that codepoint.
Change-Id: I314f8f0b169cedd96eeccc42b44153e97044388c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44704
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This changes the format of the mock QUIC transport to include an
explicit encryption level, matching real QUIC a bit better. In
particular, we need that extra data to properly skip rejected early data
on the shim side. (On the runner, we manage it by synchronizing with the
TLS stack. Still, the levels make it a bit more accurate.)
Testing sending and receiving of actual early data is not very relevant
in QUIC since application I/O is external, but this allows us to more
easily run the same tests in TLS and QUIC.
Along the way, improve error-reporting in mock_quick_transport.cc so
it's easier to diagnose record-level mismatches.
Change-Id: I96175a4023134b03d61dac089f8e7ff4eb627933
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44988
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(Original CL by svaldez, reworked by davidben.)
Change-Id: I8570808fa5e96a1c9e6e03c4877039a22e73254f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/42404
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We have an ad-hoc expectResumeVersion, and I'll want to add one for ALPS
(to confirm changing ALPS on resumption works). We probably could have
done with such a test for ALPN too. Wrap all the ConnectionState
expectations into a struct with an optional resumeExpectations field.
Also move the OCSPResponse() method to ConnectionState for consistency.
Change-Id: Icaabf5571c51e78ed078f57de0e04928d3f3fa8d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/43084
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
David Schinazi
David Benjamin
Steven Valdez
Adam Langley