This has no callers, and seems to be practically unusable. The only way
to set an X509_CRL_METHOD is X509_CRL_set_default_method, which is not
thread-safe and globally affects the CRL implementation across the
application.
The comment says it's to handle large CRLs, so lots of processes don't
have to store the same CRL in memory. As far as I can tell,
X509_CRL_METHOD cannot be used to help with this. It doesn't swap out
storage of the CRL, just signature verification and lookup into it. But
by the time we call into X509_CRL_METHOD, the CRL has already been
downloaded and the data stored on the X509_CRL structure. (Perhaps this
made more sense before the structure was made opaque?)
Update-Note: APIs relating to X509_CRL_METHOD are removed.
Change-Id: Ia5befa2a0e4f4416c2fb2febecad99fa31c1c6ac
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/52687
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: Ifdb2fe5952930c33dfa9ea5bbdb9d1ce699952a4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/52027
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This type is opaque, with no accessors or setters, and there is no way
to get a hold of one except by parsing it. It's only used indirectly via
X509 functions.
The 'other' field is unused and appears to be impossible to set or
query, in either us or upstream.
Change-Id: I4aca665872792f75e9d92e5af68da597b849d4b6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/51746
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I believe, with this, we have aligned with OpenSSL 1.1.x on the
crypto/x509 and crypto/asn1 types that are now opaque. Strangely,
OpenSSL kept X509_ALGOR public. We may wish to hide that one too later,
but we can leave it for now.
Update-Note: Use X509_REVOKED accessors rather than reaching into the
struct.
Bug: 425
Change-Id: Ib47944648a8693ed7078ffe94f7b557022debe30
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50685
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ASN1_ENCODING can be unexported because all types using it are now
hidden. This does mean external uses of <openssl/asn1t.h> can no longer
use ASN1_SEQUENCE_enc, but there do not seem to be any such uses.
ASN1_TLC and ASN1_TEMPLATE typedefs are only necessary for users of
asn1t.h. I'm hopeful we can do away with ASN1_TLC once I get to
reworking tasn_dec.c. ASN1_TEMPLATE is somewhat stuck, though all
references should be hidden behind macros.
ASN1_generate_* appear to only referenced within the library. Remove the
unused one and move the other to x509/internal.h. (asn1_gen.c is
currently in crypto/x509 rather than crypto/asn1, so I put it in
x509/internal.h to match. I'll leave figuring out that file to later.)
Annoyingly, asn1/internal.h now pulls in asn1t.h, but so it goes.
Change-Id: I8b43de3fa9647883103006e27907730d5531fd7d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50106
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
After https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/45965,
X509_VAL became largely unusable. While it did still exist as an
ASN1_ITEM and we emitted d2i/i2d/new/free functions, there is no way to
access its contents. Thus, hide it entirely.
Interestingly, although we got that to stick a while ago, I missed that
OpenSSL actually keeps X509_VAL exported, so it's possible we'll find 3p
code that uses this later. Since a standalone X509_VAL isn't especially
useful to construct or encode, this is most likely to come up in code
defining new types with <openssl/asn1t.h>.
Still, if we need to rexport this later (revert this *and* bring back
the struct), it won't be a big deal. Nothing in the public API even
constrains X509 to use X509_VAL.
Update-Note: The last remnants of the now (barely usable) X509_VAL are
no longer exported. It is unlikely anyone was relying on this.
Bug: 425
Change-Id: I90975f2f7ec27753675d2b5fa18b5cc4716319f4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50085
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was added in
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/12980/, but does
not appear to be used anymore. The corresponding function does not exist
in OpenSSL.
This simplifies the tests slightly, some of which were inadvertently
specifying the boolean and some weren't.
Change-Id: I9b956dcd9f7151910f93f377d207c88273bd9ccf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/49747
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This unexports X509, X509_CINF, X509_NAME_ENTRY, X509_NAME, X509_OBJECT,
X509_LOOKUP_METHOD, X509_STORE, X509_LOOKUP, and X509_STORE_CTX.
Note this means X509_STORE_CTX can no longer be stack-allocated.
Update-Note: Patch cl/390055173 into the roll that includes this. This
unexports most of the X.509 structs, aligning with OpenSSL. Use the
accessor APIs instead.
Bug: 425
Change-Id: I53e915bfae3b8dc4b67642279d0e54dc606f2297
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48985
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I've switched a few things to the accessors where it was easy, but
X509_EXTENSION is, in us and upstream, not const-correct right now, so
it's a little goofy.
Update-Note: Use X509_EXTENSION_get_* instead.
Change-Id: Ife9636051a924a950b1c739b7720baf12e35f9c7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48505
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
See also upstream's 9689a6aeed4ef7a2357cb95191b4313175440e4c.
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_ID made sense as a separate structure when
X509_VERIFY_PARAM was public, but now the struct is unexported.
Change-Id: I93bac64d33b76aa020fae07bba71b04f1505fdc4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48128
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We can unexport the X509_REQ_INFO type entirely. (NB: OpenSSL hasn't
done this, but has unexported so much of X509_REQ_INFO that it is
impossible to use what remains anyway.)
Update-Note: Callers that reach into X509_REQ and X509_REQ_INFO must use
accessors instead.
Change-Id: I1eea5207b9195c8051d5e467acd63ad5f0caf89d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47564
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I meant to grab more interesting types this round, but I missed a few
spots. We should be able to get these out of the way though.
Update-Note: Direct access of these structs should be replaced by
accessors.
Change-Id: I43cb8f949d53754cfebef2f84be66e89d2b96f96
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47384
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The X509_ATTRIBUTE structure includes a hack to tolerate malformed
attributes that encode the value directly instead of a set of values.
This form is never created by OpenSSL and shouldn't be needed any more.
(Imported from upstream's e20b57270dece66ce2c68aeb5d14dd6d9f3c5d68.)
This also changes X509_ATTRIBUTE_set1_data slightly. Previously,
set1_data would override whatever was previously in the X509_ATTRIBUTE,
but leak memory. Now set1_data appends to the set. (PKCS#10 attributes
use SET OF ANY as value.) It's unclear to me if this was intentional on
upstream's part. (The attrtype == 0 case only makes sense in the old
behavior.) Since there is no other way to create a two-element SET and
upstream has long since released this behavior, I left it matching
upstream.
Update-Note: Given OpenSSL hasn't accepted these for five years, it's
unlikely anything depends on it. If something breaks, we can revert this
and revisit. No one calls X509_ATTRIBUTE_set1_data on a non-empty
X509_ATTRIBUTE, so the behavior change there should be safe.
Change-Id: Ic03c793b7d42784072ec0d9a7b6424aecc738632
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46947
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
x509_req.c changes imported from upstream's
9b0a453190efc9b14cc04e74ce2e8e35af45fb39.
Update-Note: Direct accesses of X509_ATTRIBUTE should be replaced with
one of the accessors. I couldn't find any direct accesses, so hopefully
this is fine.
Change-Id: I7eab6375d5dcf366ef72e5ce059f3558c947f35b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46946
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Update-Note: Direct accesses of X509_PUBKEY should be replaced with one
of the accessors. I believe all callers have been fixed at this point.
Change-Id: Ib325782867478fb548da1bf5ef0023cf989f125b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46944
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We aim to eventually make the entire X509 structure opaque, but let's
start small.
Update-Note: I believe this is now safe to do. If there are compile
failures, switch to X509_get0_notBefore, X509_getm_notBefore, and
X509_set1_notBefore, or revert this if I'm wrong and too many callers
still need updating.
Change-Id: I6e9d91630a10ac777e13ebcdeb543b3cbeea6383
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/45965
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
David Benjamin
Bob Beck
Adam Langley