Some things that I noticed paging through.
Change-Id: I41e5e12b743fd996f5ff91d19f6edc074169f629
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/53088
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
This CL is the result of the following commands:
for d in asn1 x509 x509v3 pem; do
go run util/convert_comments.go crypto/$d/*.h
go run util/convert_comments.go crypto/$d/*.c
done
Change-Id: If78433f68cb2f913b0de06ded744a5a65540e1cf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/53087
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Previously, we did not clang-format a few directories because we had
left them largely untouched. clang-format them now so we're finally more
uniform.
This CL is the result of the following commands:
for d in asn1 x509 x509v3 pem; do
clang-format -i crypto/$d/*.h
clang-format -i crypto/$d/*.c
done
(Written in this funny way because crypto/pem/*.h doesn't match
anything.)
Change-Id: I7f4ca9b3a9c8f07d6556e00e9e84b3c0880ee12e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/53085
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
x509_rsa_ctx_to_pss returns an error when trying to make an X509_ALGOR
for an arbitrary RSA-PSS salt length. This dates to the initial commit
and isn't in OpenSSL, so I imagine this was an attempt to ratchet down
on RSA-PSS parameter proliferation.
If the caller explicitly passes in md_size, rather than using the -1
convenience value, we currently fail. Allow those too and add an error
to the error queue so it is easier to diagnose.
Change-Id: Ia738142e48930ef5a916cad5326f15f64d766ba5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/43824
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
David Benjamin
Shelley Vohr
Adam Langley