This CL runs the same command as in the preceding CL, but with
'IncludeBraces: true' added to .clang-format. I've split this out
separately because the documentation says:
> Setting this option to true could lead to incorrect code formatting
> due to clang-format’s lack of complete semantic information. As such,
> extra care should be taken to review code changes made by this option.
I've also kept InsertBraces out of .clang-format for now because it's a
fairly recent option, and clang-format fails when it sees unrecognized
options.
Change-Id: I305ea7bb2633704053a1f8de1e11b037b9fc8a76
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/53086
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Previously, we did not clang-format a few directories because we had
left them largely untouched. clang-format them now so we're finally more
uniform.
This CL is the result of the following commands:
for d in asn1 x509 x509v3 pem; do
clang-format -i crypto/$d/*.h
clang-format -i crypto/$d/*.c
done
(Written in this funny way because crypto/pem/*.h doesn't match
anything.)
Change-Id: I7f4ca9b3a9c8f07d6556e00e9e84b3c0880ee12e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/53085
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
I've switched a few things to the accessors where it was easy, but
X509_EXTENSION is, in us and upstream, not const-correct right now, so
it's a little goofy.
Update-Note: Use X509_EXTENSION_get_* instead.
Change-Id: Ife9636051a924a950b1c739b7720baf12e35f9c7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48505
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
X509*_get_*_by_NID return -1 if the extension was not found, but -2 if
the NID was invalid. Looking through callers, many check index != -1,
rather than index < 0. That means, in theory, they'll do the wrong thing
in some cases.
Realistically, this case is impossible: most callers pass in a constant.
Even in those that don't, NIDs are a local enum, not standard constants.
That means hitting this path is almost certainly a programmer error. No
need to complicate the calling convention for it.
Update-Note: The return value convention of some functions was
simplified. This is not expected to affect any callers.
Change-Id: If2f5a45c37caccdbfcc3296ff2db6db1183e3a95
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48368
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We have several implementations of this internally, so consolidate them.
Chromium also has a copy in net/der/parse_values.cc which could call
into this.
(I'm also hoping we can make c2i_ASN1_INTEGER call this and
further tighten up crypto/asn1's parser, but I see Chromium still has an
allow_invalid_serial_numbers option, so perhaps not quite yet.)
Update-Note: This CL does not change behavior, but I'm leaving a note to
myself to make net/der/parse_values.cc call the new functions.
Change-Id: If2aae6574ba6a30e343e1308da6af543616156ec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44051
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Actually making crypto/asn1 and crypto/x509 const-correct will be a tall
order, between all the hidden caches, non-const ASN.1 macros, and
ambiguity between mutable and immutable getters. But upstream
const-corrected a number of things, so align with them. (In particular,
it is not currently possible to usefully use a non-const X509_NAME.)
I think I've gotten most of x509.h. I started going through x509v3.h,
but all the conf bits take non-const char* pointers, which shows up in
the public (but probably unused) X509V3_CONF_METHOD, so I've left it
alone in this CL.
For some reason, OpenSSL made X509_get_subject_name a const-to-non-const
function but kept X509_get_serialNumber uniformly non-const while adding
a uniformly const X509_get0_serialNumber. I've just mirrored this for
compatibility's sake.
Change-Id: Ia33a7576165cf2da5922807fc065f1f114b0f84c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/42584
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley