Now that we've dropped MSVC 2015, I believe we can rely on C++14 (which
is now seven years old). This switches the build to require C++14. I've
gone ahead and switched code in both public headers and within the
library, but if the public headers are a problem, we can revert those
separately.
C++14 doesn't get us quite as much as C++17, but see if we can get to
C++14 first. Still, std::enable_if_t and the less restricted constexpr
are nice wins.
Update-Note: C++14 is now required to build BoringSSL. If the build
breaks, make sure your compiler is C++14-capable and is not passing
-std=c++11. If this is causing problems for your project, let us know.
Change-Id: If03a88e3f8a11980180781f95b806e7f3c3cb6c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/52246
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The current names are confusing because (ios, aarch64) is also used on
macOS. The various Apple platforms all use the same ABI, and aarch64 is
no longer limited to iOS. (For that matter, the iOS simulator on x86
Macs is x86 iOS.) Just call it 'apple'.
Update-Note: References to 'mac' or 'ios' source lists in downstream
builds should be renamed to 'apple'.
Change-Id: Id1a0627f8ce3241f34ffa6bb245ee5783adc7c15
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/51307
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/51265 broke
Linux and macOS platforms on architectures where we don't build
assembly. OPENSSL_NO_ASM needs to match the assembly selector.
While I'm here, remove the OPENSSL_C11_ATOMIC comment. We autodetect
atomics these days, so the flag is only useful if you want to force it.
Change-Id: I1f20f7577b5ca7e208dc90fb46a93b20da864ec5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/51305
Reviewed-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This imports the changes to sha512-armv8.pl from
upstream's af0fcf7b4668218b24d9250b95e0b96939ccb4d1.
Tweaks needed:
- Add an explicit .text because we put .LK$BITS in .rodata for XOM
- .LK$bits and code are in separate sections, so use adrp/add instead of
plain adr
- Where glibc needs feature flags to *enable* pthread_rwlock, Apple
interprets _XOPEN_SOURCE as a request to *disable* Apple extensions.
Tighten the condition on the _XOPEN_SOURCE check.
Added support for macOS and Linux, tested manually on an ARM Mac and a
VM, respectively. Fuchsia and Windows do not currently have APIs to
expose this bit, so I've left in TODOs. Benchmarks from an Apple M1 Max:
Before:
Did 4647000 SHA-512 (16 bytes) operations in 1000103us (74.3 MB/sec)
Did 1614000 SHA-512 (256 bytes) operations in 1000379us (413.0 MB/sec)
Did 439000 SHA-512 (1350 bytes) operations in 1001694us (591.6 MB/sec)
Did 76000 SHA-512 (8192 bytes) operations in 1011821us (615.3 MB/sec)
Did 39000 SHA-512 (16384 bytes) operations in 1024311us (623.8 MB/sec)
After:
Did 10369000 SHA-512 (16 bytes) operations in 1000088us (165.9 MB/sec) [+123.1%]
Did 3650000 SHA-512 (256 bytes) operations in 1000079us (934.3 MB/sec) [+126.2%]
Did 1029000 SHA-512 (1350 bytes) operations in 1000521us (1388.4 MB/sec) [+134.7%]
Did 175000 SHA-512 (8192 bytes) operations in 1001874us (1430.9 MB/sec) [+132.5%]
Did 89000 SHA-512 (16384 bytes) operations in 1010314us (1443.3 MB/sec) [+131.4%]
(This doesn't seem to change the overall SHA-256 vs SHA-512 performance
question on ARM, when hashing perf matters. SHA-256 on the same chip
gets up to 2454.6 MB/s.)
In terms of build coverage, for now, we'll have build coverage
everywhere and test coverage on Chromium, which runs this code on macOS
CI. We should request a macOS ARM64 bot for our standalone CI. Longer
term, we need a QEMU-based builder to test various features. QEMU seems
to have pretty good coverage of all this, which will at least give us
Linux.
I haven't added an OPENSSL_STATIC_ARMCAP_SHA512 for now. Instead, we
just look at the standard __ARM_FEATURE_SHA512 define. Strangely, the
corresponding -march tag is not sha512. Neither GCC and nor Clang have
-march=armv8-a+sha512. Instead, -march=armv8-a+sha3 implies both
__ARM_FEATURE_SHA3 and __ARM_FEATURE_SHA512! Yet everything else seems
to describe the SHA512 extension as separate from SHA3.
https://developer.arm.com/architectures/system-architectures/software-standards/acle
Update-Note: Consumers with a different build setup may need to
limit -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 to Linux or non-Apple platforms. Otherwise,
<sys/types.h> won't define some typedef needed by <sys/sysctl.h>. If you
see a build error about u_char, etc., being undefined in some system
header, that is probably the cause.
Change-Id: Ia213d3796b84c71b7966bb68e0aec92e5d7d26f0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50807
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Change-Id: Ieb403b6651d445948abef48d7432fd248294284f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47084
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This fixes an issue in a99308f that caused Bazel builds to break during
the analysis phase.
Change-Id: Ib26e70a52730f04905c2b2f137674f297488ec4f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/45665
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Newer versions of Bazel use a different setting for the crosstool_top
flag, depending on the NDK toolchain in use. This change detects these
crosstools and builds them using Android flags.
Fixes: 180083900
Change-Id: I937d18e53d72b2911e1c472adbce65282d31885d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/45564
Commit-Queue: Justin Paupore <jpaupore@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Piotr Sikora
Justin Paupore
Adam Langley