We still have our <= 0 return values because anything with BIOs tries to
preserve BIO_write's error returns. (Maybe we can stop doing this?
BIO_read's error return is a little subtle with EOF vs error, but
BIO_write's is uninteresting.) But the rest of the logic is size_t-clean
and hopefully a little clearer. We still have to support SSL_write's
rather goofy calling convention, however.
I haven't pushed Spans down into the low-level record construction logic
yet. We should probably do that, but there are enough offsets tossed
around there that they warrant their own CL.
Bug: 507
Change-Id: Ia0c702d1a2d3713e71b0bbfa8d65649d3b20da9b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47544
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Follow-up work will add support for TLS 1.2 ticket decryption.
Bug: 504
Change-Id: Ieaee37d94562040f1d51227216359bd63db15198
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/53525
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Writing application data goes through three steps:
1. Encrypt the data into the write buffer.
2. Flush the write buffer to the network.
3. Report to SSL_write's caller that the write succeeded.
In principle, steps 2 and 3 are done together, but it is possible that
BoringSSL needs to write something, but we are not in the middle of
servicing an SSL_write call. Then we must perform (2) but cannot perform
(3).
TLS 1.3 0-RTT on a client introduces a case like this. Suppose we write
some 0-RTT data, but it is blocked on the network. Meanwhile, the
application tries to read from the socket (protocols like HTTP/2 read
and write concurrently). We discover ServerHello..Finished and must then
respond with EndOfEarlyData..Finished. But to write, we must flush the
current write buffer.
To fix this, https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14164 split (2)
and (3) more explicitly. The write buffer may be flushed to the network
at any point, but the wpend_* book-keeping is separate. It represents
whether (3) is done. As part of that, we introduced a wpend_pending
boolean to track whether there was pending data.
This introduces an interesting corner case. We now keep NewSessionTicket
messages buffered until the next SSL_write. (KeyUpdate ACKs are
implemented similarly.) Suppose the caller calls SSL_write(nullptr, 0)
to flush the NewSessionTicket and this hits EWOULDBLOCK. We'll track a
zero-length pending write in wpend_*! A future attempt to write non-zero
data would then violate the moving buffer check. This is strange because
we don't build records for zero-length application writes in the first
place.
Instead, wpend_pending should have been wpend_tot > 0. Remove that and
rearrange the code to check that properly. Also remove wpend_ret as it
has the same data as wpend_tot.
Change-Id: I58c23842cd55e8a8dfbb1854b61278b108b5c7ea
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/53546
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
These functions aid in meeting specific compliance goals and allows
configuration of things like TLS 1.3 cipher suites, which are otherwise
not configurable.
Change-Id: I668afc734a19ecd4b996eaa23be73ce259b13fa2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/52625
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CPython and wpa_supplicant are using this nowadays. To avoid needing to
tweak the ticket nonce derivation, I've just internally capped the
number of tickets at 16, which should be plenty.
Change-Id: Ie84c15b81a2abe8ec729992e515e0bd4cc351037
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/52465
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Now that we've dropped MSVC 2015, I believe we can rely on C++14 (which
is now seven years old). This switches the build to require C++14. I've
gone ahead and switched code in both public headers and within the
library, but if the public headers are a problem, we can revert those
separately.
C++14 doesn't get us quite as much as C++17, but see if we can get to
C++14 first. Still, std::enable_if_t and the less restricted constexpr
are nice wins.
Update-Note: C++14 is now required to build BoringSSL. If the build
breaks, make sure your compiler is C++14-capable and is not passing
-std=c++11. If this is causing problems for your project, let us know.
Change-Id: If03a88e3f8a11980180781f95b806e7f3c3cb6c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/52246
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
VS 2017 was released in March 2017, five years ago now. This means VS
2015 is now past our support window.
This will make the unmarked and "vs2017" configs in CI/CQ do the same
thing. I'll follow up with a separate CL in infra/config to switch the
test VS 2019 instead.
Update-Note: BoringSSL may no longer build with VS 2015. Consumers
should upgrade to the latest Visual Studio release. VS 2017 or later is
required.
Change-Id: I477759deb95a27efe132de76d9ed103826110df0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/52085
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In testing out the ECH bits on the Chromium side, it is much harder to
tell what's going on without some indication that we sent a
ClientHelloInner. This CL routes it into the callback. A corresponding
CL in Chromium will add it to NetLog.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I945ab2679614583e875a0ba90d6cf1481ed315d9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/51205
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Both call sites end up calling them in succession. This saves a little
bit of code.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: Ib87bd9be446c368f77beb3b329deaa84ef43ac95
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/51186
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
After fixing up some issue with the BORINGSSL_IMPLEMENTATION define in
Chromium builds (which used to work fine but, with the test that
references ASN1_ITEM_rptr(BASIC_CONSTRAINTS), is a bit more strict),
I'm running into this warning.
../../third_party/boringssl/src/ssl/internal.h(3695,15): error:
'SSL_CTX_free' redeclared without 'dllimport' attribute: previous
'dllimport' ignored [-Werror,-Winconsistent-dllimport]
friend void SSL_CTX_free(SSL_CTX *);
^
Searching for friend.*EXPORT in Chromium shows they match exports in
friend declarations, so I gather this is just how it works.
Change-Id: I704686854c77406378882477a8bab3f1521e29e4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50145
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Later CLs will clean up the ClientHello construction a bit (draft-12
avoids computing ClientHelloOuter twice). I suspect the transcript
handling on the client can also be simpler, but I'll see what's
convenient after I've changed how ClientHelloOuter is constructed.
Changes of note between draft-10 and draft-13:
- There is now an ECH confirmation signal in both HRR and SH. We don't
actually make much use of this in our client right now, but it
resolves a bunch of weird issues around HRR, including edge cases if
HRR applies to one ClientHello but not the other.
- The confirmation signal no longer depends on key_share and PSK, so we
don't have to work around a weird ordering issue.
- ech_is_inner is now folded into the main encrypted_client_hello code
point. This works better with some stuff around HRR.
- Padding is moved from the padding extension, computed with
ClientHelloInner, to something we fill in afterwards. This makes it
easier to pad up the whole thing to a multiple of 32. I've accordingly
updated to the latest recommended padding construction, and updated
the GREASE logic to match.
- ech_outer_extensions is much easier to process because the order is
required to be consistent. We were doing that anyway, and now a simple
linear scan works.
- ClientHelloOuterAAD now uses an all zero placeholder payload of the
same length. This lets us simplify the server code, but, for now, I've
kept the client code the same. I'll follow this up with a CL to avoid
computing ClientHelloOuter twice.
- ClientHelloOuterAAD is allowed to contain a placeholder PSK. I haven't
filled that in and will do it in a follow-up CL.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I7464345125c53968b2fe692f9268e392120fc2eb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48912
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
tls13_init_key_schedule calls InitHash internally, but we also call
InitHash earlier at various times. On the client, we do it early to
handle HelloRetryRequest and 0-RTT. ECH draft-12 will also need to do it
early. Apparently we do it early on the server too.
Probably tls13_init_key_schedule doesn't need to call InitHash, but for
now, it is an easy check in SSLTranscript.
Change-Id: I5473047c1f29bdeb60901e4e6e80979e592bd6e9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48911
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
std::initializer_list appears to work by instantiating a T[N] at the
call site (which is what we were doing anyway), so I don't believe there
is a runtime dependency.
This also adds a way for individual entries to turn themselves off,
which means we don't need to manually check for some unsolicited
extensions.
Change-Id: I40f79b6a0e9c005fc621f4a798fe201bfbf08411
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48910
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We do this enough that it's worth extracting a common parser. And this
gives a struct we can pass around. Note this moves the server extensions
block parsing out of ssl_scan_serverhello_tlsext.
I've also consolidated a few error conditions to tighten the code up a
bit: the TLS 1.2 code distinguishes unknown from unadvertised cipher,
while the TLS 1.3 code didn't. And seeing the wrong legacy version
number in TLS 1.3 is really just a syntax error since it's not the
version field anymore. (RFC8446 specifies the value.)
Change-Id: Ia2f44ff9a3899b5a594569f1b258f2b487930496
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48908
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If a client offers ECH, but the server rejects it, the client completes
the handshake with ClientHelloOuter in order to authenticate retry keys.
Implement this flow. This is largely allowing the existing handshake to
proceed, but with some changes:
- Certificate verification uses the other name. This CL routes this up to
the built-in verifier and adds SSL_get0_ech_name_override for the
callback.
- We need to disable False Start to pick up server Finished in TLS 1.2.
- Client certificates, notably in TLS 1.3 where they're encrypted,
should only be revealed to the true server. Fortunately, not sending
client certs is always an option, so do that.
Channel ID has a similar issue. I've just omitted the extension in
ClientHelloOuter because it's deprecated and is unlikely to be used
with ECH at this point. ALPS may be worth some pondering but, the way
it's currently used, is not sensitive.
(Possibly we should change the draft to terminate the handshake before
even sending that flight...)
- The session is never offered in ClientHelloOuter, but our internal
book-keeping doesn't quite notice.
I had to replace ech_accept with a tri-state ech_status to correctly
handle an edge case in SSL_get0_ech_name_override: when ECH + 0-RTT +
reverify_on_resume are all enabled, the first certificate verification
is for the 0-RTT session and should be against the true name, yet we
have selected_ech_config && !ech_accept. A tri-state tracks when ECH is
actually rejected. I've maintained this on the server as well, though
the server never actually cares.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: Ie55966ca3dc4ffcc8c381479f0fe9bcacd34d0f8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48135
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ssl_update_cache takes the cache lock to add to the session cache,
releases it, and then immediately takes and releases the lock to
increment handshakes_since_cache_flush. Then, in 1/255 connections, does
the same thing again to flush stale sessions.
Merge the first two into one lock. In doing so, move ssl_update_cache to
ssl_session.cc, so it can access a newly-extracted add_session_lock.
Also remove the mode parameter (the SSL knows if it's a client or
server), and move the established_session != session check to the
caller, which more directly knows whether there was a new session.
Also add some TSan coverage for this path in the tests. In an earlier
iteration of this patch, I managed to introduce a double-locking bug
because we weren't testing it at all. Confirmed this test catches both
double-locking and insufficient locking. (It doesn't seem able to catch
using a read lock instead of a write lock in SSL_CTX_flush_sessions,
however. I suspect the hash table is distributing the cells each thread
touches.)
Update-Note: This reshuffles some locks around the session cache.
(Hopefully for the better.)
Change-Id: I78dca53fda74e036b90110cca7fbcc306a5c8ebe
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48133
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The one place where LHASH_OF(T) appears in public APIs is
X509V3_EXT_conf_nid. This is only ever called with conf = NULL, but
cryptography.io needs to utter the type name as part of bindings. Thus
this CL keeps DECLARE_LHASH_OF and LHASH_OF macros public and the others
private.
Update-Note: BoringSSL no longer provides a general-purpose hash table
to callers. Use the language's standard library, or another
implementation.
Change-Id: Ibfc65c4b4bf35abf5b1919658d0c52e4004e6629
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48205
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is a bit more self-explanatory, especially now that TLS 1.0 is the
minimum version we implement anyway.
Change-Id: Ic65e9f90bb5cd747328bd9e30b976d1e124c7764
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48130
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was added in draft-11, which I'll update to more broadly in a
follow-up CL. This is an easily separable component: we don't want to
allow the DNS to arbitrarily insert strings in the ClientHello, so
invalid public names are rejected.
Unfortunately, we have a bit of a mess because DNS syntax does not
exclude IPv4 literals, yet everyone sticks DNS and IP literals in the
same string. The RFC3986 rules are alright, but don't match reality.
Reality is (probably?) the WHATWG rules, which are a mess.
The load-bearing bit of the spec is that, at certificate verification,
you should reject whatever strings your application refuses to represent
as a DNS name. I'll have Chromium call into its URL parser.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-esni-11.html#section-6.1.4.3-3
But there's still a bit at the validation step where clients "SHOULD"
run the IPv4 parser. In case downstream logic forgets, I've gone ahead
and implemented the WHATWG IPv4 parser.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-esni-11.html#section-4-6.6.1
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I15aa1ac0391df9c3859c44b8a259296e1907b7d4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48085
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Although not permitted by the TLS specification, systems sometimes
ossify TLS extension order, or byte offsets of various fields. To
keep the ecosystem healthy, add an API to reorder ClientHello
extensions.
Since ECH, HelloRetryRequest, and HelloVerifyRequest are sensitive to
extension order, I've implemented this by per-connection permutation of
the indices in the kExtensions structure. This ensures that all
ClientHellos within a connection are consistently ordered. As follow-up
work, permuting the other messages would also be nice, though any server
messages would need to be incorporated in handshake hints.
Change-Id: I18ce39b4df5ee376c654943f07ec26a50e0923a9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48045
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Based on an initial implementation by Dan McArdle at
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46784
This CL contains most of a client implementation for
draft-ietf-tls-esni-10. The pieces missing so far, which will be done in
follow-up CLs are:
1. While the ClientHelloInner is padded, the server Certificate message
is not. I'll add that once we resolve the spec discussions on how to
do that. (We were originally going to use TLS record-level padding,
but that doesn't work well with QUIC.)
2. The client should check the public name is a valid DNS name before
copying it into ClientHelloOuter.server_name.
3. The ClientHelloOuter handshake flow is not yet implemented. This CL
can detect when the server selects ClientHelloOuter, but for now the
handshake immediately fails. A follow-up CL will remove that logic
and instead add the APIs and extra checks needed.
Otherwise, this should be complete, including padding and compression.
The main interesting point design-wise is that we run through
ClientHello construction multiple times. We need to construct
ClientHelloInner and ClientHelloOuter. Then each of those has slight
variants: EncodedClientHelloInner is the compressed form, and
ClientHelloOuterAAD just has the ECH extension erased to avoid a
circular dependency.
I've computed ClientHelloInner and EncodedClientHelloInner concurrently
because the compression scheme requires shifting the extensions around
to be contiguous. However, I've computed ClientHelloOuterAAD and
ClientHelloOuter by running through the logic twice. This probably can
be done better, but the next draft revises the construction anyway, so
I'm thinking I'll rework it then. (In the next draft, we use a
placeholder payload of the same length, so we can construct the
ClientHello once and fill in the payload.)
Additionally, now that we have a client available in ssl_test, this adds
a threading test to confirm that SSL_CTX_set1_ech_keys is properly
synchronized. (Confirmed that, if I drop the lock in
SSL_CTX_set1_ech_keys, TSan notices.)
Change-Id: Icaff68b595035bdcc73c468ff638e67c84239ef4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48004
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We'll probably need to make this more complex later, but this should be
a start. I had hoped this would also simplify tests, MakeECHConfig() was
still needed to generate weird inputs for tests. I've instead tidied
that up a bit with a params structure. Now the only hard-coded ECHConfig
in tests is to check the output of the new API.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I640a224fb4b7a7d20e8a2cd7a1e75d1e3fe69936
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48003
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously we would extract the KEM ID from the ECHConfig and then parse
the private key using the corresponding KEM type. This CL makes it take
a pre-pared EVP_HPKE_KEY and checks it matches. This does require the
caller pass the key type through externally, which is probably prudent?
(On the other hand we are still inferring config from the rest of the
ECHConfig... maybe we can add an API to extract the EVP_HPKE_KEM from a
serialized ECHConfig if it becomes a problem. I could see runner or tool
wanting that out of convenience.)
The immediate motivation is to add APIs to programmatically construct
ECHConfigs. I'm thinking we can pass a const EVP_HPKE_KEY * to specify
the key, at which point it's weird for SSL_ECH_KEYS_add to look
different.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I2d424323885103d3fe0a99a9012c160baa8653bd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48002
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Computing the binders on ClientHelloInner is a little interesting. While
I'm in the area, tidy this up a bit. The exploded parameters may as well
be an SSL_SESSION, and hash_transcript_and_truncated_client_hello can
just get folded in.
Change-Id: I9d3a7e0ae9f391d6b9a23b51b5d7198e15569b11
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47997
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This makes calls to ssl_add_clienthello_tlsext a hair easier. Also we
only apply the [256, 511) compatibility hack to TLS, so we can just use
a constant.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: Ia2b5192aeef0cd8848ecfa1ea3b89a0a7382ff1a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47996
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
May not be strictly necessary, but similarly easier to reason about when
we need to interweave multiple ClientHellos.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I9f85787860f3e8ce1653331ce52343d5bf5def23
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47992
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is less effective than it seems because both
((const SSL_HANDSHAKE*)hs)->ssl and ((const SSL*)ssl)->s3 are both
non-const pointers. I considered moving hs->ssl to hs->ssl_ and adding
const-overloaded accessors, but I'd need to repeat the same with
ssl->s3, at which point this seemed not worth it yet. Maybe later if we
rewrite everything to more idiomatic C++.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I9912a3df205916fdf2191a3687013d717528038d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47991
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is kinda annoying and, like the grease_seed, demonstrates a
shortcoming with the idea of making add_clienthello completely const.
Strictly speaking, we only need idempotence. But I think this is okay:
const is much easier to enforce than idempotence, and we'll likely need
to do this anyway:
- While not in the current draft, I expect the draft's eventual HRR
resolution to retain the ECH extension, GREASE or not, on ECH reject.
Things are somewhat violating RFC8446 HRR rules right now. That means
we'll need to stash the ECH payload regardless.
- ECH binds all the other extensions in the outer ClientHello, so
computing the payload will need to move outside the callback system
anyway.
In some sense, all this is shifting our ClientHello output from the
"immediate mode" end of the spectrum (as we usually use) to the
"retained mode" end, which I suppose makes sense as this message becomes
more intricate.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I9eb8cd1cde2ce264345b6ed3ee526d4eab81e911
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47990
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This lets ssl_get_grease_value be const. The lazy thing isn't a
deal-breaker (we only need idempotence, and a non-thread-safe const also
works fine), but just initializing it earlier seems simpler.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: Iad228ea4a9146ede9a3849f3339f7ec9e698e6eb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47988
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Like the early_data CL, this does shift a bit of logic that was
previously hidden away in the callbacks. For key_share, this is probably
a good move independent of ECH. The logic around HRR, etc., was a little
messy.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: Iafbcebdf66ce1f7957d798a98ee6b996fff24639
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47986
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Also add ECH GREASE state into the mix. Clearing this isn't critical,
especially now that we have an SSL_HANDSHAKE structure, but it's easy
enough.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: If1aa8d5c0c8fdb5af710852778ce452c507a2524
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47985
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ECH requires that we construct two ClientHellos. That means our
add_clienthello callbacks will need to be called multiple times and
should be const. (They already are called multiple times for
HelloRetryRequest, but we currently thread that through the callbacks a
bit. With ECH, I think we need to make them pure serialization.)
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I11f8195fd2ec4b8639f0a2af01a24d4974445580
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47984
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
While decompression is deterministic, compression is not. New revisions
of the compression algorithm may start using different (hopefully
smaller!) compressions. So this doesn't cause hint mismatches, add a
certificate compression hint. If the shim's Certificate message matches
the handshaker, we'll reuse the already compressed message.
This also adds what appears to be a missing test for when the server
cannot find compression algorithms in common.
Change-Id: Idbedaceb20208463d8f61581ee27971c17fcd126
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48005
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The first thing any deployment will want to monitor is whether ECH was
actually used. Also it's useful if the command-line tool can output
this. (The alert is how the client signals it discarded the connection
due to ECH reject.)
This also disables ECH with the handoff mechanism for now. (The
immediate cause being that ech_accept isn't serialized.) We'll probably
need to make some decisions around the ordering here, since ECH affects
where the true ClientHello is available.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: Ie4559733290e653a514fcd94431090bf86bc3172
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47911
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Make it a little clearer they shouldn't be updating sequence numbers,
enqueuing the message, etc. That's left to add_message. (ECH clients
need to construct a pair of parallel ClientHellos.)
Change-Id: I554a8f200d464727bc219b66931b3d0bae266f76
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47908
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The remaining remnants of Channel ID all configure the private key ahead
of time. Unwind the callback machinery, which cuts down on async points
and the cases we need to test.
This also unwinds some odd interaction between the callback and
SSL_set_tls_channel_id_enabled: If a client uses
SSL_set_tls_channel_id_enabled but doesn't set a callback, the handshake
would still pause at SSL_ERROR_WANT_CHANNEL_ID_LOOKUP. This is now
removed, so SSL_set_tls_channel_id_enabled only affects the server and
SSL_CTX_set1_tls_channel_id only affects the client.
Update-Note: SSL_CTX_set_channel_id_cb is removed.
SSL_set_tls_channel_id_enabled no longer enables Channel ID as a client,
only as a server.
Change-Id: I89ded99ca65e1c61b1bc4e009ca0bdca0b807359
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47907
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The channel_id_valid bit is both used for whether channel_id is filled
in (SSL_get_tls_channel_id), and whether this particular handshake will
eventually negotiate Channel ID.
The former means that, if SSL_get_tls_channel_id is called on the
client, we'll return all zeros. Apparently we never fill in channel_id
on the client at all. The latter means the state needs to be reset on
renegotiation because we do not currently forbid renegotiation with
Channel ID (we probably should...), which is the last use of the init
callback for extensions.
Instead, split this into a bit for the handshake and a bit for the
connection. Note this means we actually do not expose or even retain
whether Channel ID was used on the client.
This requires a tweak to the handoff logic, but it should be compatible.
The serialized ssl->s3->channel_id was always a no-op: the handback
happens before the ChannelID message, except in RSA key exchange. But we
forbid Channel ID in RSA key exchange anyway.
Update-Note: SSL_get_tls_channel_id will no longer return all zeros
during the handshake or on the client. I did not find any callers
relying on this.
Change-Id: Icd4b78dd3f311d1c7dfc1cae7d2b86dc7e327a99
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47906
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We didn't end up deploying this. We also never implemented the final
RFC, so what we do have isn't useful for someone who wishes to deploy
it anyway.
Update-Note: Token binding APIs are removed.
Change-Id: Iecea7c3dcf9d3e2644a3b7afaf61511310b45d5f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47584
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's kind of weird that we assign a session ID, based on whether we
detect the handshake wants stateful resumption, and then erase it
afterwards.
Also remove the is_server parameter, which we can get from hs.
Change-Id: I94ac817c63abb08a457e0e0c29f5c2d2b60aa498
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47444
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was fixed in review, but we forgot to update the comment.
Change-Id: If1fdd9211ff085edeb50457edf0caba5e31b6d16
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47448
Reviewed-by: Dan McArdle <dmcardle@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This introduces an EVP_HPKE_KEM, to capture the KEM choice, and
EVP_HPKE_KEY, to capture the key import (and thus avoids asking
receivers to pass in the full keypair). It is a bit more wordy now, but
we'll be in a better place when some non-TLS user inevitably asks for a
P-256 version.
Bug: 410
Change-Id: Icb9cc8b028e6d1f86e6d8adb31ebf1f975181675
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47329
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Callers using private key callbacks may retain non-trivial state with a
private key. In many cases, the private key is no longer necessary
immediately after the first round-trip (e.g. non-HRR TLS 1.3
connections). Add a function that callers can query to drop the state a
hair earlier.
This is tested in two ways. First, the asserts in front of using the
key, combined with existing tests, ensure we don't start reporting it
too early. Second, I've added tests in ssl_test.cc to assert we report
it as early as we expect to.
In doing so, the number of parameters on ConnectClientAndServer()
started getting tedious, so I've split that into a
CreateClientAndServer() and CompleteHandshakes(). Callers that need to
configure weird things or drive the handshake manually can call
CreateClientAndServer() (which takes care of the BIO pair business) and
continue from there.
Bug: b/183734559
Change-Id: I05e1edb6d269c8468ba7cde7dc90e0856694a0ca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This replaces the ID-based API with one that is more static linker
friendly. For ECH, it doesn't make a difference because we currently
pull in all the options we've implemented. But this means other HPKE
uses need not pull in everything ECH needs and vice versa.
Along the way, fix an inconsistency: we prefixed all the AEAD constants
with "AEAD", but not the others. Since the rest of the name already
determines everything, go with the shorter version.
Bug: 410
Change-Id: I56e46c13b43c97e15eeb45204cde7019dd21e250
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47327
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I8096070386af7d2b5020875ea09bcc0c04ebc8cd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/47245
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
See go/handshake-hints (internal).
CL originally by Bin Wu <wub@google.com>. I just reworked the tests and
tidied it up a bit. This is the start of a replacement for the split
handshakes API. For now, only TLS 1.3 is supported. It starts with an
initial set of hints, but we can add more later. (In particular, we
should probably apply the remote handshaker's extension order to avoid
needing to capability protect such changes.)
Change-Id: I7b6a6dfaa84c6c6e3436d2a4026c3652b8a79f0f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46535
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley
Steven Valdez