The representation here is a bit more messy than necessary. In doing so,
clean up the variable names and smooth away two rough edges:
- X509_ALGOR_get0 would leave *out_param_value uninitialized if
*out_param_type is V_ASN1_UNDEF. Instead, set it to NULL, so callers
do not accidentally use an uninitialized pointer.
- X509_PUBKEY_set0_param, if key is NULL, would leave the key alone. No
one calls this function externally and none of the (since removed)
callers in OpenSSL rely on this behavior. A NULL check here adds a
discontinuity at the empty string that seems unnecessary here:
changing the algorithm without changing the key isn't useful.
(Note the API doesn't support changing the key without the algorithm.)
Note for reviewing: the representation of ASN1_TYPE is specified
somewhat indirectly. ASN1_TYPE uses the ASN1_ANY ASN1_ITEM, which has
utype V_ASN1_ANY. Then you look at asn1_d2i_ex_primitive and asn1_ex_c2i
which peel off the ASN1_TYPE layer and parse directly into the value
field, with a fixup for NULL. Hopefully we can rework this someday...
Change-Id: I628c4e20f8ea2fd036132242337f4dcac5ba5015
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46165
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This still needs some overall documentation describing ASN1_STRING's
relationship to all the other types, but start with the easy bits.
Change-Id: I968d4b1b3d57a9b543b3db489d14cf0789e30eb3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44049
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Not especially important, but leaving the input unchanged on malloc
failure is a little tidier.
Change-Id: Ia001260edcc8d75865d0d75ac0fe596205f83c48
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44048
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
At one point in the SSLeay days, all the ASN1_STRING typedefs were
separate structs (but only in debug builds) and the M_ASN1_* macros
included type casts to handle this.
This is long gone, but we still have the M_ASN1_* macros. Remove the
casts and switch code within the library to call the macros. Some
subtleties:
- The "MSTRING" types (what OpenSSL calls its built-in CHOICEs
containing some set of string types) are weird because the M_FOO_new()
macro and the tasn_new.c FOO_new() function behave differently. I've
split those into a separate CL.
- ASN1_STRING_type, etc., call into the macro, which accesses the field
directly. This CL inverts the dependency.
- ASN1_INTEGER_new and ASN1_INTEGER_free, etc., are generated via
IMPLEMENT_ASN1_STRING_FUNCTIONS in tasn_typ.c. I've pointed
M_ASN1_INTEGER_new and M_ASN1_INTEGER_free to these fields. (The free
function is a no-op, but consistent.)
- The other macros like M_ASN1_BIT_STRING_dup largely do not have
corresponding functions. I've aligned with OpenSSL in just using the
generic ASN1_STRING_dup function. But some others, like
M_ASN1_OCTET_STRING_dup have a corresponding ASN1_OCTET_STRING_dup
function. OpenSSL retained these, so I have too.
Update-Note: Some external code uses the M_ASN1_* macros. This should
remain compatible, but some type errors may have gotten through
unnoticed. This CL restores type-checking.
Change-Id: I8656abc7d0f179192e05a852c97483c021ad9b20
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44045
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Sadly we need to keep ASN1_put_eoc. Ruby uses it.
OpenSSL's PKCS#7 implementation generated an "ndef" variant of the
encoding functions, to request indefinite-length encoding. Remove the
support code for this.
Update-Note: Types that use one of the NDEF macros in asn1t.h will fail
to compile. This CL should not affect certificate parsing.
Change-Id: I6e03f6927ea4b7a6acd73ac58bf49512b39baab8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/43889
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This function is unused and quite unsafe.
Update-Note: Use ASN1_STRING_set instead, though this function appears
to be unused.
Change-Id: Ie6f4dec4b9e11ebde95b322ef91e1b8d63fbb8af
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/42724
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley