For some reason, ASN1_STRING_print was not in the same file as
ASN1_STRING_print_ex, but X509_print. Although it also behaves very
differently from ASN1_STRING_print_ex, so that's a little interesting.
Change-Id: I3f88f8943c8e36426eedafa7e350a787881d0c74
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48775
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
With io_ch unwound, X509_NAME_print_ex just calls ASN1_STRING_print_ex,
so we can put all the code in the right directories. We need to
duplicate maybe_write, but it's a one-line function.
Change-Id: Ifaa9f1a24ee609cbaa24f93eb992f7d911f1b4a0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48774
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
No sense in implementing a BIO/FILE abstraction when BIO is itself a
FILE abstraction. Follow-up CLs will unwind the char_io abstraction and
then split the ASN1 and X509 bits of this file.
Change-Id: I00aaf2fbab44abdd88252ceb5feb071ad126a0b2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48772
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We've never tested this and plenty of files depend on FILE* APIs without
ifdefs.
Change-Id: I8c51c043e068b30bdde1723c3810d3e890eabfca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48771
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ASN1_STRING_set_by_NID is very complex and depends on a "global mask"
for most NIDs. (Some NIDs use a single type and use STABLE_NO_MASK to
disable the global mask.) Historically, it defaulted to allowing all
types, but it switched to UTF8String in OpenSSL 1.0.2.
Updating the global mask is not thread-safe, and it's 2021. Let's just
always use UTF-8. The only callers I found set it to UTF-8 anyway (with
the exception of some test script we don't use, and some code that
wasn't compiled). No-op writes in the C/C++ memory model are still race
conditions, so this CL fixes some bugs in those callers.
Update-Note: The global mask for ASN1_STRING_set_by_NID is now always
UTF-8. Callers that want another type should reconsider and, if UTF-8 is
still unsuitable, just pass the actual desired type into
ASN1_mbstring_copy, X509_NAME_ENTRY_set_data, etc
Change-Id: I679e99c57da9a48c805460abcb3af5b2f938c93f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48766
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This syncs this file up to e7ff223a20697e5a401d2d9bb7a75e699ed46633 from
upstream's OpenSSL_1_1_1-stable branch. The main change of note is the
4x loop from upstream's 7ff2fa4b9281232f0ca1db03d42a954c462ef77d,
9ee020f8dc7813db82a119058d8f57e70e7e8904,
aa7bf316980259a11dcbaf6128ed86d33dc24b97, and
603ebe03529101424670051aa0c616dc6e037b28.
Benchmarks on a Pixel 4a.
Before:
Did 14069000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 2000042us (112.5 MB/sec)
Did 6768000 AES-128-GCM (256 bytes) seal operations in 2000182us (866.2 MB/sec)
Did 1902000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 2000479us (1283.5 MB/sec)
Did 359000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 2003942us (1467.6 MB/sec)
Did 182000 AES-128-GCM (16384 bytes) seal operations in 2002245us (1489.3 MB/sec)
Did 13388000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 2000144us (107.1 MB/sec)
Did 6069000 AES-256-GCM (256 bytes) seal operations in 2000276us (776.7 MB/sec)
Did 1638000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 2001076us (1105.1 MB/sec)
Did 305000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 2000040us (1249.3 MB/sec)
Did 155000 AES-256-GCM (16384 bytes) seal operations in 2009398us (1263.8 MB/sec)
After:
Did 13837000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 2000131us (110.7 MB/sec) [-1.7%]
Did 7506000 AES-128-GCM (256 bytes) seal operations in 2000197us (960.7 MB/sec) [+10.9%]
Did 2289000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 2000734us (1544.5 MB/sec) [+20.3%]
Did 443000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 2000321us (1814.2 MB/sec) [+23.6%]
Did 225000 AES-128-GCM (16384 bytes) seal operations in 2002308us (1841.1 MB/sec) [+23.6%]
Did 13280000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 2000011us (106.2 MB/sec) [-0.8%]
Did 6630000 AES-256-GCM (256 bytes) seal operations in 2000229us (848.5 MB/sec) [+9.2%]
Did 1916000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 2000373us (1293.1 MB/sec) [+17.0%]
Did 365000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 2001519us (1493.9 MB/sec) [+19.6%]
Did 185000 AES-256-GCM (16384 bytes) seal operations in 2006588us (1510.5 MB/sec) [+19.5%]
(See cl/387919990 for some notes I made in reviewing, though likely
future me will find them incomprehensible anyway.)
Change-Id: Id386e80143611487e07b2fbfda15d0abc54ea145
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48726
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CMake's language is rather fragile and unsound. For the most part, it is
a shell script with more parentheses. That is, it simply expands command
arguments into a list of strings and then evaluates it, complete with
shell-style differences between "${FOO}" and ${FOO}.
The if() command is special and internally also expands variables. That
is why things like if(FOO STREQUAL "BAR") work. CMake interprets "FOO"
as a variable if it can find a variable, or a string otherwise. In
addition to getting very confused on typos, it means that
if("${FOO}" STREQUAL "BAR") will double-expand, and it will do strange
things if BAR is a variable.
CMP0054 patches this (which we set by minimum version) so that if() only
expands if the token was unquoted. This fixes
if("${FOO}" STREQUAL "BAR"). However, if(${FOO} STREQUAL "BAR")
continues to double-expand FOO.
We had a mix of all three of FOO, ${FOO}, and "${FOO}". It's not clear
which is the canonical spelling at this point, but CMake own files
(mostly) use FOO, as do most of our lines, so I've standardized on that.
It's a little unsatisfying if we typo a variable, but I suppose ${FOO}
also silently ignores unset variables.
Bug: 423
Change-Id: Ib6baa27f4065eed159e8fb28820b71a0c99e0db0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48705
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
They would previously output syntax errors.
Change-Id: I7817a91d0c8ed8d6ac6a5a1fd9c9ed1223c5960e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48667
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This flag is set when an ASN1_STRING is created from a codepath that is
aware it is an "mstring" (CHOICE of multiple string or string-like
types). With setters like X509_set_notBefore, it is very easy to
accidentally lose the flag on some field that normally has it.
The only place the flag is checked is X509_time_adj_ex. X509_time_adj_ex
usually transparently picks UTCTime vs GeneralizedTime, as in the X.509
CHOICE type. But if writing to an existing object AND if the object
lacks the flag, it will lock to whichever type the object was
previously. It is likely any caller hitting this codepath is doing so
unintentionally and has a latent bug that won't trip until 2050.
In fact, one of the ways callers might accidentally lose the
ASN1_STRING_FLAG_MSTRING flag is by using X509_time_adj_ex!
X509_time_adj_ex(NULL) does not use an mstring-aware constructor. This
CL avoids needing such a notion in the first place.
Looking through callers, the one place that wants the old behavior is a
call site within OpenSSL, to set the producedAt field in OCSP. That
field is a GeneralizedTime, rather than a UTCTime/GeneralizedTime
CHOICE. We dropped that code, but I'm making a note of it to remember
when filing upstream.
Update-Note: ASN1_STRING_FLAG_MSTRING is no longer defined and
X509_time_adj_ex now behaves more predictably. Callers that actually
wanted to lock to a specific type should call ASN1_UTCTIME_adj or
ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME_adj instead.
Change-Id: Ib9e1c9dbd0c694e1e69f938da3992d1ffc9bd060
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48668
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This covers most of the ASN.1 time functions and a handful more of
x509.h. Also remove some code under #if 0.
I'm running out of a easy ones to do, which is probably a good thing.
Change-Id: I085b1e2a54d191a7a5f18c801b3c135cfda7bd88
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48665
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The polynomials have 701, 16-bit values. But poly_Rq_mul was reading 32
bytes at offset 1384 in order to get the last 18 of them. This silently
worked for a long time, but when 7153013019 switched to keeping
variables on the stack it was noticed by Valgrind.
This change fixes the overread. Setting watchpoints at the ends of the
two inputs (and one output) now shows no overreads nor overwrites.
BUG=424
Change-Id: Id86c1407ffce66593541c10feee47213f4b95c5d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48645
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This reverts commit be9a86f459. Let's try
this again.
Bug: 375
Change-Id: Ie01cced8017835b2cc6d80e5e81a4508a37fbbaf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48625
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
In configurations without threads, we're not thread-safe anyway. Instead
use the refcount_lock.c implementation which, in turn, calls into
thread_none.c, so this turns into a plain refcount.
This avoids a build issue on platforms which define NO_THREADS, use C11,
lack C11 atomics, and are missing a __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ definition. The
platforms ought to define __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ or implement them, but
atomics are also unnecessary overheard in NO_THREADS configurations
anyway.
Change-Id: I927e1825dd6474d95226b93dad704594f120450a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48565
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some callers want the value to be heap-allocated. It's a little annoying
that this returns an empty value (if we only supported heap-allocated
ones, I'd have merged init into new), but since we have multiple
constructor functions, this is probably the least fuss.
Change-Id: I42f586e39850954fb6743f8be50a7cfffa0755ba
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48526
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Trusty wants to seed from a different RNG than the one that supplies
per-draw entropy. This is a no-op change unless you're substituting in
your own implementations of these functions.
To see that it's a no-op in urandom.c, note that it only changes the
|seed| argument to |fill_with_entropy|. That causes the value of
|extra_getrandom_flags_for_seed_bss_get| to be ORed into the flags,
but that value will always be zero unless it's an Android FIPS build.
Change-Id: Ic8d954df3074559cbf1bfee1ae91a4a2b7e14d9d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48485
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The stack consumption of the HRSS functions is causing issues in
stack-constrained environments. Therefore allocate many variables on the
heap. This means that several HRSS_ functions now allocate, and thus can
fail, where they couldn't before. Callers that ignore the return value
and don't have crash-on-failure mallocs will still be safe, although
things will fail to decrypt later on.
Somehow, this actually makes key generation _faster_ on my machine. (I
don't know. Better alignment? Fewer L1 collisions?) The other operations
are slightly slower, as expected.
Before:
Did 17390 HRSS generate operations in 3054088us (5694.0 ops/sec)
Did 225000 HRSS encap operations in 3000512us (74987.2 ops/sec)
Did 87000 HRSS decap operations in 3014525us (28860.3 ops/sec)
After:
Did 21300 HRSS generate operations in 3026637us (7037.5 ops/sec)
Did 221000 HRSS encap operations in 3008911us (73448.5 ops/sec)
Did 84000 HRSS decap operations in 3007622us (27929.0 ops/sec)
Change-Id: I2312df8909af7d8d250c7c483c65038123f21ad9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48345
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I've switched a few things to the accessors where it was easy, but
X509_EXTENSION is, in us and upstream, not const-correct right now, so
it's a little goofy.
Update-Note: Use X509_EXTENSION_get_* instead.
Change-Id: Ife9636051a924a950b1c739b7720baf12e35f9c7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48505
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Also use a slightly more conservative pattern. Instead of aligning the
pointer as a uintptr_t and casting back, compute the offset and advance
in pointer space. C guarantees that casting from pointer to uintptr_t
and back gives the same pointer, but general integer-to-pointer
conversions are generally implementation-defined. GCC does define it in
the useful way, but this makes fewer dependencies.
Change-Id: I70c7af735e892fe7a8333b78b39d7b1f3f1cdbef
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48405
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
See also f8fc0e35e0b1813af15887d42e17b7d5537bb86c from upstream, though
our BN_divs have diverged slightly.
Change-Id: I49fa4f0a5c730d34e6f41f724f1afe3685470712
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48426
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
X509*_get_*_by_NID return -1 if the extension was not found, but -2 if
the NID was invalid. Looking through callers, many check index != -1,
rather than index < 0. That means, in theory, they'll do the wrong thing
in some cases.
Realistically, this case is impossible: most callers pass in a constant.
Even in those that don't, NIDs are a local enum, not standard constants.
That means hitting this path is almost certainly a programmer error. No
need to complicate the calling convention for it.
Update-Note: The return value convention of some functions was
simplified. This is not expected to affect any callers.
Change-Id: If2f5a45c37caccdbfcc3296ff2db6db1183e3a95
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48368
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This function's behavior differs from all the other lastpos functions.
It does not appear to be used anywhere, so remove it. (lastpos = -1
returns the first match, lastpos = -2 additionally fails if there are
duplicates, lastpos = -3 additionally fails if the attribute is
multiply-valued.)
Update-Note: X509at_get0_data_by_OBJ is removed. We found no callers of
this function.
Change-Id: I8547bac6626623e43827e2490f04850eb148e317
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48367
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The comments say that this should work, but it didn't. OpenSSL doesn't
have any documentation about this but from looking at the code it works
there. (Along with things like magic sections called “ENV” to get
environment variables, sigh.)
Change-Id: I538fbad57e6af37eee739de6d2643f554bfc5c79
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48386
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
lh_strhash mapped nullptr to zero. ec8c67dfbc switched CONF's use to
OPENSSL_strhash, which crashes on nullptr. But CONF depends on the
nullptr handling.
Change-Id: I131c752aa089fb99b01c9e406b6994f3a6236976
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48385
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
EVP_MD_nid, in OpenSSL, is the same as EVP_MD_type. EVP_MD_type seems to
be the preferred spelling, so put EVP_MD_nid in the deprecated bucket.
Also add an EVP_MD_do_all alias to EVP_MD_do_all_sorted.
Change-Id: I4e7b800902459ac5cb9ef0df65d73da94afdf927
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48365
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This cleans up the story with
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46164. None of
our exported functions mutate ASN1_OBJECTS, with the exception of
ASN1_OBJECT_free, the object reuse mode of c2i_ASN1_OBJECT, and their
callers. Those functions check flags to correctly handle static
ASN1_OBJECTs.
For now, I've kept the struct definition in crypto/asn1 even though
ASN1_OBJECT is partially in crypto/obj. Since we prefer to cut
dependencies to crypto/asn1, we probably should rearrange this later.
I've also, for now, kept crypto/asn1/internal.h at C-style comments,
though our style story here is weird. (Maybe it's time to clang-format
crypto/asn1 and crypto/x509? Patches from upstream rarely directly apply
anyway, since we're a mix of 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 in crypto/x509.)
Update-Note: ASN1_OBJECT is now opaque. Callers should use accessors.
Change-Id: I655e6bd8afda98a2d1e676c3abeb873aa8de6691
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48326
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Additionally decorate ipv4_from_asc and ipv6_from_asc with their
array lengths.
Bug: 419
Change-Id: I2bce182ac260b071f076434deadab4096d29b2b1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48265
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
If a client offers ECH, but the server rejects it, the client completes
the handshake with ClientHelloOuter in order to authenticate retry keys.
Implement this flow. This is largely allowing the existing handshake to
proceed, but with some changes:
- Certificate verification uses the other name. This CL routes this up to
the built-in verifier and adds SSL_get0_ech_name_override for the
callback.
- We need to disable False Start to pick up server Finished in TLS 1.2.
- Client certificates, notably in TLS 1.3 where they're encrypted,
should only be revealed to the true server. Fortunately, not sending
client certs is always an option, so do that.
Channel ID has a similar issue. I've just omitted the extension in
ClientHelloOuter because it's deprecated and is unlikely to be used
with ECH at this point. ALPS may be worth some pondering but, the way
it's currently used, is not sensitive.
(Possibly we should change the draft to terminate the handshake before
even sending that flight...)
- The session is never offered in ClientHelloOuter, but our internal
book-keeping doesn't quite notice.
I had to replace ech_accept with a tri-state ech_status to correctly
handle an edge case in SSL_get0_ech_name_override: when ECH + 0-RTT +
reverify_on_resume are all enabled, the first certificate verification
is for the 0-RTT session and should be against the true name, yet we
have selected_ech_config && !ech_accept. A tri-state tracks when ECH is
actually rejected. I've maintained this on the server as well, though
the server never actually cares.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: Ie55966ca3dc4ffcc8c381479f0fe9bcacd34d0f8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48135
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These macros aren't consumed by anything anymore.
Change-Id: Id9616fa0962ae0dbf27bc884c6883dcad9755eb2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48229
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We already had a test, but move it to asn1_test.cc since it's part of
the ASN.1 library. Also, since it's easy, test it using public APIs
rather than stack-allocating an ASN1_STRING.
Change-Id: Ic77494e6c8f74584d159a600e334416197761475
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48227
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OpenSSL's BIT STRING representation has two modes, one where it
implicitly trims trailing zeros and the other where the number of unused
bits is explicitly set. This means logic in ASN1_item_verify, or
elsewhere in callers, that checks flags and ASN1_STRING_length is
inconsistent with i2c_ASN1_BIT_STRING.
Add ASN1_BIT_STRING_num_bytes for code that needs to deal with X.509
using BIT STRING for some fields instead of OCTET STRING. Switch
ASN1_item_verify to it. Some external code does this too, so export it
as public API.
This is mostly a theoretical issue. All parsed BIT STRINGS use explicit
byte strings, and there are no APIs (apart from not-yet-opaquified
structs) to specify the ASN1_STRING in X509, etc., structures. We
intentionally made X509_set1_signature_value, etc., internally construct
the ASN1_STRING. Still having an API is more consistent and helps nudge
callers towards rejecting excess bits when they want bytes.
It may also be worth a public API for consistently accessing the bit
count. I've left it alone for now because I've not seen callers that
need it, and it saves worrying about bytes-to-bits overflows.
This also fixes a bug in the original version of the truncating logic
when the entire string was all zeros, and const-corrects a few
parameters.
Change-Id: I9d29842a3d3264b0cde61ca8cfea07d02177dbc2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48225
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The one place where LHASH_OF(T) appears in public APIs is
X509V3_EXT_conf_nid. This is only ever called with conf = NULL, but
cryptography.io needs to utter the type name as part of bindings. Thus
this CL keeps DECLARE_LHASH_OF and LHASH_OF macros public and the others
private.
Update-Note: BoringSSL no longer provides a general-purpose hash table
to callers. Use the language's standard library, or another
implementation.
Change-Id: Ibfc65c4b4bf35abf5b1919658d0c52e4004e6629
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48205
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is a bit short of a name to take, and no one seems to be using
it. (OpenSSL has renamed it, but not unexported it.)
Change-Id: I0de74d4d4812678ac3b1ec4b1b126a7748fe952b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48129
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
See also upstream's 9689a6aeed4ef7a2357cb95191b4313175440e4c.
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_ID made sense as a separate structure when
X509_VERIFY_PARAM was public, but now the struct is unexported.
Change-Id: I93bac64d33b76aa020fae07bba71b04f1505fdc4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48128
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This comment dates to SSLeay. It appears to be describing the
incremental trial division strategy where they would pick a starting
candidate, compute moduli by small primes, and then update by
incrementing the candidate and saved moduli instead of dividing from
scratch. We use a simpler rejection sampling strategy.
Change-Id: If2203d616f2b1f632bcd7033ceb60a83d1b75674
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48047
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Based on an initial implementation by Dan McArdle at
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/46784
This CL contains most of a client implementation for
draft-ietf-tls-esni-10. The pieces missing so far, which will be done in
follow-up CLs are:
1. While the ClientHelloInner is padded, the server Certificate message
is not. I'll add that once we resolve the spec discussions on how to
do that. (We were originally going to use TLS record-level padding,
but that doesn't work well with QUIC.)
2. The client should check the public name is a valid DNS name before
copying it into ClientHelloOuter.server_name.
3. The ClientHelloOuter handshake flow is not yet implemented. This CL
can detect when the server selects ClientHelloOuter, but for now the
handshake immediately fails. A follow-up CL will remove that logic
and instead add the APIs and extra checks needed.
Otherwise, this should be complete, including padding and compression.
The main interesting point design-wise is that we run through
ClientHello construction multiple times. We need to construct
ClientHelloInner and ClientHelloOuter. Then each of those has slight
variants: EncodedClientHelloInner is the compressed form, and
ClientHelloOuterAAD just has the ECH extension erased to avoid a
circular dependency.
I've computed ClientHelloInner and EncodedClientHelloInner concurrently
because the compression scheme requires shifting the extensions around
to be contiguous. However, I've computed ClientHelloOuterAAD and
ClientHelloOuter by running through the logic twice. This probably can
be done better, but the next draft revises the construction anyway, so
I'm thinking I'll rework it then. (In the next draft, we use a
placeholder payload of the same length, so we can construct the
ClientHello once and fill in the payload.)
Additionally, now that we have a client available in ssl_test, this adds
a threading test to confirm that SSL_CTX_set1_ech_keys is properly
synchronized. (Confirmed that, if I drop the lock in
SSL_CTX_set1_ech_keys, TSan notices.)
Change-Id: Icaff68b595035bdcc73c468ff638e67c84239ef4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48004
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We'll probably need to make this more complex later, but this should be
a start. I had hoped this would also simplify tests, MakeECHConfig() was
still needed to generate weird inputs for tests. I've instead tidied
that up a bit with a params structure. Now the only hard-coded ECHConfig
in tests is to check the output of the new API.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I640a224fb4b7a7d20e8a2cd7a1e75d1e3fe69936
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48003
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously we would extract the KEM ID from the ECHConfig and then parse
the private key using the corresponding KEM type. This CL makes it take
a pre-pared EVP_HPKE_KEY and checks it matches. This does require the
caller pass the key type through externally, which is probably prudent?
(On the other hand we are still inferring config from the rest of the
ECHConfig... maybe we can add an API to extract the EVP_HPKE_KEM from a
serialized ECHConfig if it becomes a problem. I could see runner or tool
wanting that out of convenience.)
The immediate motivation is to add APIs to programmatically construct
ECHConfigs. I'm thinking we can pass a const EVP_HPKE_KEY * to specify
the key, at which point it's weird for SSL_ECH_KEYS_add to look
different.
Bug: 275
Change-Id: I2d424323885103d3fe0a99a9012c160baa8653bd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/48002
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley
Giorgio Marinelli