Should not run jemalloc with ASAN simultaneously.
Change-Id: I2ea3107178c11fe34978bb093737564e1222c0d5
Signed-off-by: niewei <niewei@xiaomi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/51945
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: Ic3305debe9c5d85b1c47be4ebcdfcbd0660f49af
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/50865
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
There are cases where people grep binaries for strings like OpenSSL
version strings in order to detect when out-dated versions of libraries
are being used. With BoringSSL you might find "OpenSSL 1.1.1
(compatible; BoringSSL)", if the linker didn't discard it, but that's
not very helpful for knowing how up-to-date BoringSSL is because we
hardly ever change it.
This change adds a distinct random value to search for that uniquely
identifies BoringSSL and includes a rough guide to how old the BoringSSL
copy is. The linker will hopefully not discard it because it's
refereneced from |OPENSSL_malloc|.
Change-Id: Ie2259fd17a55d249a538a8a161b0d755396dd7b8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/49885
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In upstream, these functions take file and line number arguments. Update
ours to match. Guessing almost no one uses these, or we'd have caught
this earlier.
Change-Id: Ic09f8d8274065ac02efa78e70c215b87fa765b9f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/49665
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Brittain <bwb@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
niewei
Adam Langley
David Benjamin
Adam Langley