This aligns with OpenSSL's behavior. RFC7301 says servers should return
no_application_protocol if the client supported ALPN but no common
protocol was found. We currently interpret all values as
SSL_TLSEXT_ERR_NOACK. Instead, implement both modes and give guidance on
whne to use each. (NOACK is still useful because the callback may be
shared across multiple configurations, some of which don't support ALPN
at all. Those would want to return NOACK to ignore the list.)
To match upstream, I've also switched SSL_R_MISSING_ALPN, added for
QUIC, to SSL_R_NO_APPLICATION_PROTOCOL.
Update-Note: Callers that return SSL_TLSEXT_ERR_ALERT_FATAL from the
ALPN callback will change behavior. The old behavior may be restored by
returning SSL_TLSEXT_ERR_NOACK, though see the documentation for new
recommendations on return values.
Change-Id: Ib7917b5f8a098571bed764c79aa7a4ce0f728297
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/45504
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This imports 1ecc76f6746cefd502c7e9000bdfa4e5d7911386 and
41d62636fd996c031c0c7cef746476278583dc9e from upstream. These would have
rejected the mistake in OpenSSL's EDIPartyName sturcture.
Change-Id: I4eb218f9372bea0f7ff302321b9dc1992ef0c13a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44424
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(Original CL by svaldez, reworked by davidben.)
Change-Id: I8570808fa5e96a1c9e6e03c4877039a22e73254f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/42404
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Update-Note: If an SSL_QUIC_METHOD is set, connections will now fail if
ALPN is not negotiated. This new behavior can be detected by checking
if the value of BORINGSSL_API_VERSION is greater than 10.
Bug: 294
Change-Id: I42fb80aa09268e77cec4a51e49cdad79bd72fa58
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/42304
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reason codes 1000+N correspond to receiving an alert N from the peer,
rather than observing the corresponding error condition locally. This
has generally been a source of confusion for folks.
They were originally named like SSL_R_TLSV1_ALERT_DECRYPTION_FAILED, but
OpenSSL introduced a few without the "ALERT" token in
739a543ea863682f157e9aa0ee382367eb3d187c.
We then inadvertently carried the mistake over in
SSL_R_TLSV1_UNKNOWN_PSK_IDENTITY and SSL_R_TLSV1_CERTIFICATE_REQUIRED.
Fix all these to include the "ALERT" for consistency and make it
slightly less confusing. (Although perhaps it should have been
RECEIVED_ALERT or so.) Add compatibility #defines for the original
OpenSSL ones and SSL_R_TLSV1_CERTIFICATE_REQUIRED. The latter can be
removed when downstream code is fixed. The OpenSSL ones we'll probably
just leave around.
Update-Note: The renamed alerts will log slightly different strings, but
the constants used by external code are still there.
Bug: 366
Change-Id: I30c299c4ad4b2bed695bd71d0831fbe6755975a7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/42384
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
David Benjamin
Steven Valdez
Daniel McArdle
Nick Harper
Adam Langley