Abseil Common Libraries (C++) (grcp 依赖)
https://abseil.io/
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
138 lines
6.5 KiB
138 lines
6.5 KiB
# How to Contribute to Abseil |
|
|
|
We'd love to accept your patches and contributions to this project. There are |
|
just a few small guidelines you need to follow. |
|
|
|
NOTE: If you are new to GitHub, please start by reading [Pull Request |
|
howto](https://help.github.com/articles/about-pull-requests/) |
|
|
|
## Contributor License Agreement |
|
|
|
Contributions to this project must be accompanied by a Contributor License |
|
Agreement. You (or your employer) retain the copyright to your contribution, |
|
this simply gives us permission to use and redistribute your contributions as |
|
part of the project. Head over to <https://cla.developers.google.com/> to see |
|
your current agreements on file or to sign a new one. |
|
|
|
You generally only need to submit a CLA once, so if you've already submitted one |
|
(even if it was for a different project), you probably don't need to do it |
|
again. |
|
|
|
## Contribution Guidelines |
|
|
|
Potential contributors sometimes ask us if the Abseil project is the appropriate |
|
home for their utility library code or for specific functions implementing |
|
missing portions of the standard. Often, the answer to this question is "no". |
|
We’d like to articulate our thinking on this issue so that our choices can be |
|
understood by everyone and so that contributors can have a better intuition |
|
about whether Abseil might be interested in adopting a new library. |
|
|
|
### Priorities |
|
|
|
Although our mission is to augment the C++ standard library, our goal is not to |
|
provide a full forward-compatible implementation of the latest standard. For us |
|
to consider a library for inclusion in Abseil, it is not enough that a library |
|
is useful. We generally choose to release a library when it meets at least one |
|
of the following criteria: |
|
|
|
* **Widespread usage** - Using our internal codebase to help gauge usage, most |
|
of the libraries we've released have tens of thousands of users. |
|
* **Anticipated widespread usage** - Pre-adoption of some standard-compliant |
|
APIs may not have broad adoption initially but can be expected to pick up |
|
usage when it replaces legacy APIs. `absl::from_chars`, for example, |
|
replaces existing code that converts strings to numbers and will therefore |
|
likely see usage growth. |
|
* **High impact** - APIs that provide a key solution to a specific problem, |
|
such as `absl::FixedArray`, have higher impact than usage numbers may signal |
|
and are released because of their importance. |
|
* **Direct support for a library that falls under one of the above** - When we |
|
want access to a smaller library as an implementation detail for a |
|
higher-priority library we plan to release, we may release it, as we did |
|
with portions of `absl/meta/type_traits.h`. One consequence of this is that |
|
the presence of a library in Abseil does not necessarily mean that other |
|
similar libraries would be a high priority. |
|
|
|
### API Freeze Consequences |
|
|
|
Via the |
|
[Abseil Compatibility Guidelines](https://abseil.io/about/compatibility), we |
|
have promised a large degree of API stability. In particular, we will not make |
|
backward-incompatible changes to released APIs without also shipping a tool or |
|
process that can upgrade our users' code. We are not yet at the point of easily |
|
releasing such tools. Therefore, at this time, shipping a library establishes an |
|
API contract which is borderline unchangeable. (We can add new functionality, |
|
but we cannot easily change existing behavior.) This constraint forces us to |
|
very carefully review all APIs that we ship. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Coding Style |
|
|
|
To keep the source consistent, readable, diffable and easy to merge, we use a |
|
fairly rigid coding style, as defined by the |
|
[google-styleguide](https://github.com/google/styleguide) project. All patches |
|
will be expected to conform to the style outlined |
|
[here](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html). |
|
|
|
## Guidelines for Pull Requests |
|
|
|
* If you are a Googler, it is preferable to first create an internal CL and |
|
have it reviewed and submitted. The code propagation process will deliver |
|
the change to GitHub. |
|
|
|
* Create **small PRs** that are narrowly focused on **addressing a single |
|
concern**. We often receive PRs that are trying to fix several things at a |
|
time, but if only one fix is considered acceptable, nothing gets merged and |
|
both author's & review's time is wasted. Create more PRs to address |
|
different concerns and everyone will be happy. |
|
|
|
* For speculative changes, consider opening an [Abseil |
|
issue](https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/issues) and discussing it first. |
|
If you are suggesting a behavioral or API change, consider starting with an |
|
[Abseil proposal template](ABSEIL_ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md). |
|
|
|
* Provide a good **PR description** as a record of **what** change is being |
|
made and **why** it was made. Link to a GitHub issue if it exists. |
|
|
|
* Don't fix code style and formatting unless you are already changing that |
|
line to address an issue. Formatting of modified lines may be done using |
|
`git clang-format`. PRs with irrelevant changes won't be merged. If |
|
you do want to fix formatting or style, do that in a separate PR. |
|
|
|
* Unless your PR is trivial, you should expect there will be reviewer comments |
|
that you'll need to address before merging. We expect you to be reasonably |
|
responsive to those comments, otherwise the PR will be closed after 2-3 |
|
weeks of inactivity. |
|
|
|
* Maintain **clean commit history** and use **meaningful commit messages**. |
|
PRs with messy commit history are difficult to review and won't be merged. |
|
Use `rebase -i upstream/master` to curate your commit history and/or to |
|
bring in latest changes from master (but avoid rebasing in the middle of a |
|
code review). |
|
|
|
* Keep your PR up to date with upstream/master (if there are merge conflicts, |
|
we can't really merge your change). |
|
|
|
* **All tests need to be passing** before your change can be merged. We |
|
recommend you **run tests locally** (see below) |
|
|
|
* Exceptions to the rules can be made if there's a compelling reason for doing |
|
so. That is - the rules are here to serve us, not the other way around, and |
|
the rules need to be serving their intended purpose to be valuable. |
|
|
|
* All submissions, including submissions by project members, require review. |
|
|
|
## Running Tests |
|
|
|
Use "bazel test <>" functionality to run the unit tests. |
|
|
|
Prerequisites for building and running tests are listed in |
|
[README.md](README.md) |
|
|
|
## Abseil Committers |
|
|
|
The current members of the Abseil engineering team are the only committers at |
|
present. |
|
|
|
## Release Process |
|
|
|
Abseil lives at head, where latest-and-greatest code can be found.
|
|
|