Chiebot-Mirror/FFmpeg - FFmpeg - Gitea: Git with a cup of tea

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Memphiz	998609ddb8	aarch64: vp9: Fix assembling with Xcode 6.2 and older Properly use the b.eq/b.ge forms instead of the nonstandard forms (which both gas and newer clang accept though), and expand the register list that used a range (which the Xcode 6.2 clang, based on clang 3.5 svn, didn't support). This is cherrypicked from libav commit `a970f9de86`. Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>	8 years ago
Memphiz	a970f9de86	aarch64: vp9: Fix assembling with Xcode 6.2 and older Properly use the b.eq/b.ge forms instead of the nonstandard forms (which both gas and newer clang accept though), and expand the register list that used a range (which the Xcode 6.2 clang, based on clang 3.5 svn, didn't support). Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>	8 years ago
Martin Storsjö	045e33ae3f	aarch64: vp9mc: Calculate less unused data in the 4 pixel wide horizontal filter No measured speedup on a Cortex A53, but other cores might benefit. This is cherrypicked from libav commit `388e0d2515`. Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>	8 years ago
Martin Storsjö	ac6cb8ae5b	aarch64: vp9mc: Simplify the extmla macro parameters Fold the field lengths into the macro. This makes the macro invocations much more readable, when the lines are shorter. This also makes it easier to use only half the registers within the macro. This is cherrypicked from libav commit `5e0c2158fb`. Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>	8 years ago
Martin Storsjö	388e0d2515	aarch64: vp9mc: Calculate less unused data in the 4 pixel wide horizontal filter No measured speedup on a Cortex A53, but other cores might benefit. Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>	8 years ago
Martin Storsjö	5e0c2158fb	aarch64: vp9mc: Simplify the extmla macro parameters Fold the field lengths into the macro. This makes the macro invocations much more readable, when the lines are shorter. This also makes it easier to use only half the registers within the macro. Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>	8 years ago
Martin Storsjö	0ba0187535	aarch64: vp9mc: Fix a comment to refer to a register with the right name This is cherrypicked from libav commit `85ad5ea72c`. Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>	8 years ago
Martin Storsjö	85ad5ea72c	aarch64: vp9mc: Fix a comment to refer to a register with the right name Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>	8 years ago
Martin Storsjö	1f7801c2bc	aarch64: vp9: Add NEON optimizations of VP9 MC functions This work is sponsored by, and copyright, Google. These are ported from the ARM version; it is essentially a 1:1 port with no extra added features, but with some hand tuning (especially for the plain copy/avg functions). The ARM version isn't very register starved to begin with, so there's not much to be gained from having more spare registers here - we only avoid having to clobber callee-saved registers. Examples of runtimes vs the 32 bit version, on a Cortex A53: ARM AArch64 vp9_avg4_neon: 27.2 23.7 vp9_avg8_neon: 56.5 54.7 vp9_avg16_neon: 169.9 167.4 vp9_avg32_neon: 585.8 585.2 vp9_avg64_neon: 2460.3 2294.7 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_4h_neon: 132.7 125.2 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_4hv_neon: 478.8 442.0 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_4v_neon: 126.0 93.7 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_8h_neon: 241.7 234.2 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_8hv_neon: 690.9 646.5 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_8v_neon: 245.0 205.5 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_64h_neon: 11273.2 11280.1 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_64hv_neon: 22980.6 22184.1 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_64v_neon: 11549.7 10781.1 vp9_put4_neon: 18.0 17.2 vp9_put8_neon: 40.2 37.7 vp9_put16_neon: 97.4 99.5 vp9_put32_neon/armv8: 346.0 307.4 vp9_put64_neon/armv8: 1319.0 1107.5 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_4h_neon: 126.7 118.2 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_4hv_neon: 465.7 434.0 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_4v_neon: 113.0 86.5 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_8h_neon: 229.7 221.6 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_8hv_neon: 658.9 621.3 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_8v_neon: 215.0 187.5 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_64h_neon: 10636.7 10627.8 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_64hv_neon: 21076.8 21026.9 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_64v_neon: 9635.0 9632.4 These are generally about as fast as the corresponding ARM routines on the same CPU (at least on the A53), in most cases marginally faster. The speedup vs C code is pretty much the same as for the 32 bit case; on the A53 it's around 6-13x for ther larger 8tap filters. The exact speedup varies a little, since the C versions generally don't end up exactly as slow/fast as on 32 bit. This is an adapted cherry-pick from libav commit `383d96aa22`. Signed-off-by: Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje@gmail.com>	8 years ago
Martin Storsjö	383d96aa22	aarch64: vp9: Add NEON optimizations of VP9 MC functions This work is sponsored by, and copyright, Google. These are ported from the ARM version; it is essentially a 1:1 port with no extra added features, but with some hand tuning (especially for the plain copy/avg functions). The ARM version isn't very register starved to begin with, so there's not much to be gained from having more spare registers here - we only avoid having to clobber callee-saved registers. Examples of runtimes vs the 32 bit version, on a Cortex A53: ARM AArch64 vp9_avg4_neon: 27.2 23.7 vp9_avg8_neon: 56.5 54.7 vp9_avg16_neon: 169.9 167.4 vp9_avg32_neon: 585.8 585.2 vp9_avg64_neon: 2460.3 2294.7 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_4h_neon: 132.7 125.2 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_4hv_neon: 478.8 442.0 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_4v_neon: 126.0 93.7 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_8h_neon: 241.7 234.2 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_8hv_neon: 690.9 646.5 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_8v_neon: 245.0 205.5 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_64h_neon: 11273.2 11280.1 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_64hv_neon: 22980.6 22184.1 vp9_avg_8tap_smooth_64v_neon: 11549.7 10781.1 vp9_put4_neon: 18.0 17.2 vp9_put8_neon: 40.2 37.7 vp9_put16_neon: 97.4 99.5 vp9_put32_neon/armv8: 346.0 307.4 vp9_put64_neon/armv8: 1319.0 1107.5 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_4h_neon: 126.7 118.2 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_4hv_neon: 465.7 434.0 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_4v_neon: 113.0 86.5 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_8h_neon: 229.7 221.6 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_8hv_neon: 658.9 621.3 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_8v_neon: 215.0 187.5 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_64h_neon: 10636.7 10627.8 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_64hv_neon: 21076.8 21026.9 vp9_put_8tap_smooth_64v_neon: 9635.0 9632.4 These are generally about as fast as the corresponding ARM routines on the same CPU (at least on the A53), in most cases marginally faster. The speedup vs C code is pretty much the same as for the 32 bit case; on the A53 it's around 6-13x for ther larger 8tap filters. The exact speedup varies a little, since the C versions generally don't end up exactly as slow/fast as on 32 bit. Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>	8 years ago