Silences warning(s) like:
libavcodec/x86/fft.asm:93: warning: section flags ignored on
section redeclaration
The cause of this warning is that because `struc` and `endstruc`
attempts to revert to the previous section state [1].
The section state is stored in the macro __SECT__, defined by
x86inc.asm to be `.note.GNU-stack ...`, through the `SECTION`
directive [2].
Thus, the `.note.GNU-stack` section is defined twice
(once in x86inc.asm, once during `endstruc`), causing the warning.
That is the first part of the commit: using the primitive `[section]` format
for .note.GNU-stack etc., which does not update `__SECT__` [2].
That fixes only half of the problem. Even without any `SECTION` directives,
`__SECT__` is predefined as `.text`, which conflicting with the later
`SECTION_TEXT` (which expands to `.text align=16`).
[1]: http://www.nasm.us/doc/nasmdoc6.html#section-6.4
[2]: http://www.nasm.us/doc/nasmdoc6.html#section-6.3
Signed-off-by: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
This commit silences warning(s) like:
libavcodec/x86/fft.asm:93: warning: section flags ignored on section
redeclaration
The cause of this warning is that because `struc` and `endstruc` attempts to
revert to the previous section state [1]. The section state is stored in the
macro __SECT__, defined by x86inc.asm to be `.note.GNU-stack ...`, through the
`SECTION` directive [2]. Thus, the `.note.GNU-stack` section is defined twice
(once in x86inc.asm, once during `endstruc`), causing the warning.
That is the first part of the commit: using the primitive `[section]` format
for .note.GNU-stack etc., which does not update `__SECT__` [2].
That fixes only half of the problem. Even without any `SECTION` directives,
`__SECT__` is predefined as `.text`, which conflicting with the later
`SECTION_TEXT` (which expands to `.text align=16`).
[1]: http://www.nasm.us/doc/nasmdoc6.html#section-6.4
[2]: http://www.nasm.us/doc/nasmdoc6.html#section-6.3
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
SSE2 instructions that are XMM-implementations of pre-existing MMX/MMX2
instructions did not issue warnings when used in SSE functions. Handle
it by also checking the register type when such instructions are used.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
This mimicks what is done for the other instruction sets.
Tested-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Mickaël Raulet <mraulet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
~560 → ~500 decicycles
This is following the comments from Michael in
https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-August/160599.html
Using 2 registers for accumulator didn't help. On the other hand,
some re-ordering between the movs and psadbw allowed going ~538 to ~500.
Up to four instructions less depending on function and instruction set.
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
Only 8-bit and 10-bit idct_dc() functions are included (adding others should be trivial).
Benchmarks on an Intel Core i5-4200U:
idct8x8_dc
SSE2 MMXEXT C
cycles 22 26 57
idct16x16_dc
AVX2 SSE2 C
cycles 27 32 249
idct32x32_dc
AVX2 SSE2 C
cycles 62 126 1375
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mickaël Raulet <mraulet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
Those macros take a byte number as shift argument, as this argument
differs between MMX and SSE2 instructions.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
It was lost during the port.
Should fix fate on 3dnowext machines.
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
Use the xm# and ym# aliases as they remain in sync with m# after a SWAP.
No actual changes to the assembly.
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
Also port relevant AVX2/XOP optimizations from x264 with permission
to relicense to LGPL from the corresponding authors
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbultje@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
AV_CPU_FLAG_AVX is enabled at this point only if there's OS support.
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
We need the emulation to support the cases where the first
argument is the same as the fourth. To achieve this a fifth
argument working as a temporary may be needed.
Emulation that doesn't obey the original instruction semantics
can't be in x86inc.
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
Timothy Gu
James Almer
Michael Niedermayer
Ronald S. Bultje
Peter Cordes
Christophe Gisquet
James Darnley
Anton Mitrofanov
Kieran Kunhya
lvqcl
Henrik Gramner
Loren Merritt
Clément Bœsch
Diego Biurrun
Matt Oliver