The RFC spec draft only specifies the "H265" name - there is no
specification saying how to interpret "HEVC" (if such a packet
format is specified it could be an entirely different format).
Since this is a very new standard (still a draft), there is little
need for compatibility with existing, broken implementations. Therefore
remove the extra alias, to avoid the risk of encouraging incorrect
usage.
Intentionally keeping the ff_hevc_dynamic_handler name for the
handler, to use "hevc" consistently as name for the codec instead
of "h265" within the library internals as long as there only is one
single variant in actual use.
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
H263 in RTP can be packetized in two formats (RFC 2190, RFC
2429/4629). The former normally uses the static payload type 34,
while the latter normally uses dynamic payload types with the
SDP format names H263-1998 or H263-2000.
Look for packets that don't look like proper RFC 2190 packets and
switch to depacketizing them according to the new format if they
match some heuristic criteria.
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This is different from the "modern" RTP payload formats for H263
as defined by RFC 4629, 2429 and 3555. According to the newer RFCs,
this old one is to be considered deprecated and only be used for
interoperating with legacy systems.
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This requires using a separate init function, since there
isn't necessarily any fmtp lines for this codec, so
parse_sdp_a_line won't be called. Incorporating it with the
alloc function wouldn't do either, since it is called before
the full rtpmap line is parsed (where the sample rate is
extracted).
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Vittorio Giovara
Thomas Volkert
Martin Storsjö
Samuel Pitoiset
Miroslav Slugeň
Mans Rullgard
Josh Allmann