It is only used by demuxers (although it is hypothetically
possible that some day e.g. a protocol might need it, but
that is unlikely given that they don't deal with AVCodecParameters).
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
This is possible now that the next-API is gone.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Fixes: signed integer overflow: 100794754 * 28 cannot be represented in type 'int'
Fixes: 26474/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_dem_RSD_fuzzer-5181797606096896
Found-by: continuous fuzzing process https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpeg
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
It is not uncommon to find code where the caller thinks to know better
what the return value should be than the callee. E.g. something like
"if (av_new_packet(pkt, size) < 0) return AVERROR(ENOMEM);". This commit
changes several instances of this to instead forward the actual error.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Negative values don't make sense and too large values can cause
overflows. For AV_CODEC_ID_ADPCM_THP this leads to a too small extradata
buffer being allocated, causing out-of-bounds writes.
Reviewed-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <Andreas.Cadhalpun@googlemail.com>