Otherwise during scaling it will try to interpret input in the wrong way and
that leads to the test results disagreeing on different platforms and with
different optimizations.
Signed-off-by: Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>
Unlike YASM, NASM only looks for include files in the current
directory, not in the directory that included files reside in.
Signed-off-by: Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>
After a flush, don't average the output envelope and energy with
previous iterations.
Also start directly from the target values for the first iteration
at startup.
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This was a leftover from previous iterations of the code, where the
refl coef arrays were statically allocated.
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Some awk versions do not treat the result of unary + on a (numeric)
string as numeric, giving wrong results when used in a boolean context
Using unary - instead is logically equivalent works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Replace INIT_AVX by INIT_XMM avx. Port the whole file to use cpuflag
based function declarations. Remove (now unused) cputype argument in
function declaration macros. Change function prototypes to have mmx2
instead of mmxext as suffix, since that's required by cpuflags.
This isn't too useful as a normal codec, but can be used in
voip style applications. The decoder updates the noise
generator parameters when a packet is given to it for decoding,
but if called with an empty packet, it generates more noise
according to the last parameters.
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This gets rid of this warning:
libavformat/rtsp.c: In function ‘rtsp_parse_transport’:
libavformat/rtsp.c:794: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Mainly clean up the RTP statistics code, plus a few other obviously
misindentend lines.
Remove some useless comments, de-doxygenize some comments,
add spacing around operators and fix a typo.
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Subtracting a (positive) value from the address of an array violates
C99 section 6.5.6:
If both the pointer operand and the result point to elements of the
same array object, or one past the last element of the array object,
the evaluation shall not produce an overflow; otherwise, the
behavior is undefined.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>