DSP bits of swri_resample go into their own mini-DSP functions; DSP
init goes from a per-call branch in multiple_resample to a proper
DSP init routine; x86 bits go into x86/; swri_resample() moves out of
resample_template.c into resample.c because it's independent of DSP
code or sample type; multiple_resample() is simplified.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
I don't see dst_incr/dst_incr_frac ever being changed from their
initial value (which is the inverse of this operation), so it seems
to me that this is a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
I think there's an off-by-one in terms of the switchpoint where we
switch from dst_incr to ideal_dst_incr, I don't think that's a massive
issue, but just be aware of that. It's probably trivial to prevent but
I don't care.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
I could not reproduce any off by 1 error, results are bit exact (michael)
This removes a branch at a performance-sensitive point (in the middle
of the loop). In fate-swr-resample-s32p-8000-2626, this makes the code
about 10% faster. It also simplifies the loops, allowing us to rewrite
it in yasm at some later point.
The compensation_distance != 0 code and index < 0 code are still kind
of hairy. For compensation_distance != 0, this should likely be handled
in the caller, so that it calls swri_resample twice (once until the
dst_incr switch-point, and once with the remainder of the samples). For
index < 0, the code should probably be rewritten to break out of the
loop once sample_index >= 0, and then resume (e.g. as a tail-call) to
the common or linear resampling loops.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
This should avoid slight differences in the output causes by input
size alignment differences between archs
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
Related to CID1197063
The limit choosen is arbitrary and much larger than what makes sense.
It avoids the need for checking arithmetic operations with the length for overflow
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
pshuf+paddd is slightly faster than phaddd.
The real gain is in pre-ssse3 processors like AMD K8 and K10, which get
a big boost in performance compared to the mmxext version
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
These are not supported by all compilers (gcc 2.95 but also older SPARC
compilers, see gcc bug #33304 for example), and there is no real need for them.
One use of this feature remains in libavdevice/v4l2.c which can't be
replaced quite as easily.
Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>
The constant may change in libavutil but the library may be compiled
against an older version, thus rejecting a value which is otherwise
supported by the new libavutil.
INT_MAX is used here to denote the max allowed value for a sample format.
The opt-test code is changed to provide a valid reference example.
Originally written by James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
With the following contributions by Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
* Use descriptions of libraries from the pkg-config file generation function
* Use "FFmpeg Project" as CompanyName (suggested by Alexander Strasser)
* Use "FFmpeg" for ProductName as MSDN says "name of the product with which the
file is distributed" [1].
* Use FFmpeg's version (N-xxxxx-gxxxxxxx) for ProductVersion per MSDN [1].
* Only build the .rc files when --enable-small is not enabled.
[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa381058.aspx
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
Fixes Ticket2859
Note, testcases related to the downmix channels are welcome.
(id like to make sure this is working correctly now, as obviously it didnt
work before ...)
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>