For some reason add_hfyu_median_prediction_cmov is only selected
on 3Dnow-capable CPUs, even though it uses no 3Dnow instructions.
This patch allows it to be selected on any cpu with cmov with the
possibility of being overridden by the mmxext version.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Refactoring mmx2/mmxext YASM code with cpuflags will force renames.
So switching to a consistent naming scheme beforehand is sensible.
The name "mmxext" is more official and widespread and also the name
of the CPU flag, as reported e.g. by the Linux kernel.
Currently there is a wild mix of 3dn2/3dnow2/3dnowext. Switching to
"3dnowext", which is a more common name of the CPU flag, as reported
e.g. by the Linux kernel, unifies this.
These functions are not faster than other mmx implementations on
any hardware I have been able to test on, and they are horribly
inaccurate. There is thus no reason to ever use them.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
In ff_put_pixels_clamped_mmx(), there are two assembly code blocks.
In the first block (in the unrolled loop), the instructions
"movq 8%3, %%mm1 \n\t", and so forth, have problems.
From above instruction, it is clear what the programmer wants: a load from
p + 8. But this assembly code doesn’t guarantee that. It only works if the
compiler puts p in a register to produce an instruction like this:
"movq 8(%edi), %mm1". During compiler optimization, it is possible that the
compiler will be able to constant propagate into p. Suppose p = &x[10000].
Then operand 3 can become 10000(%edi), where %edi holds &x. And the instruction
becomes "movq 810000(%edx)". That is, it will stride by 810000 instead of 8.
This will cause a segmentation fault.
This error was fixed in the second block of the assembly code, but not in
the unrolled loop.
How to reproduce:
This error is exposed when we build using Intel C++ Compiler, with
IPO+PGO optimization enabled. Crashed when decoding an MJPEG video.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com>
This moves all VP3-specific function pointers from dsputil to a
new vp3dsp context. There is no reason to ever use the VP3 IDCT
where an MPEG2 IDCT is expected or vice versa.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Code mostly inspired by vp8's MC, however:
- its MMX2 horizontal filter is worse because it can't take advantage of
the coefficient redundancy
- that same coefficient redundancy allows better code for non-SSSE3 versions
Benchmark (rounded to tens of unit):
V8x8 H8x8 2D8x8 V16x16 H16x16 2D16x16
C 445 358 985 1785 1559 3280
MMX* 219 271 478 714 929 1443
SSE2 131 158 294 425 515 892
SSSE3 120 122 248 387 390 763
End result is overall around a 15% speedup for SSSE3 version (on 6 sequences);
all loop filter functions now take around 55% of decoding time, while luma MC
dsp functions are around 6%, chroma ones are 1.3% and biweight around 2.3%.
Signed-off-by: Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>
This removes all references to AVCodecContext.dsp_mask and marks
it for eviction at the next version bump. It has been superseded
by av_set_cpu_flag_mask() which, unlike this field, works everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
This splits ff_dsputil_init_mmx() into multiple functions, one for
each MMX/SSE level, somewhat simplifying the nested conditions.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Signed-off-by: Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>
While pshufb allows emulating bswap on XMM registers for SSSE3, more
shuffling is needed for SSE2. Alignment is critical, so specific codepaths
are provided for this case.
For the huffyuv sequence "angels_480-huffyuvcompress.avi":
C (using bswap instruction): ~ 55k cycles
SSE2: ~ 40k cycles
SSSE3 using unaligned loads: ~ 35k cycles
SSSE3 using aligned loads: ~ 30k cycles
Signed-off-by: Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>
This macro can cause problems in conjunction with the bitdepth
template expansion. It was presumably added to keep source
compatibility when high bitdepth support was added. However,
emulated_edge_mc is a dsputil pointer and should not be called
directly, so there is little reason to keep such a macro.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>