Current code returned the number of channels as channel layout in that case,
and if nret is not set then unknown layouts are typically not supported.
Also use the common parsing code. Use a temporary workaround to parse an
unknown channel layout such as '13c', after a 1 year grace period only '13C'
will work.
Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu>
This treats the case of no slices like no frames which it basically is.
The field is added to the context as other nal related fields are also there
and passing the has_slices field per *arguments is ugly and not consistent
Found-by: ubitux
Approved-by: ubitux
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
This work is sponsored by, and copyright, Google.
Previously all subpartitions except the eob=1 (DC) case ran with
the same runtime:
Cortex A7 A8 A9 A53
vp9_inv_dct_dct_16x16_sub16_add_neon: 3188.1 2435.4 2499.0 1969.0
vp9_inv_dct_dct_32x32_sub32_add_neon: 18531.7 16582.3 14207.6 12000.3
By skipping individual 4x16 or 4x32 pixel slices in the first pass,
we reduce the runtime of these functions like this:
vp9_inv_dct_dct_16x16_sub1_add_neon: 274.6 189.5 211.7 235.8
vp9_inv_dct_dct_16x16_sub2_add_neon: 2064.0 1534.8 1719.4 1248.7
vp9_inv_dct_dct_16x16_sub4_add_neon: 2135.0 1477.2 1736.3 1249.5
vp9_inv_dct_dct_16x16_sub8_add_neon: 2446.7 1828.7 1993.6 1494.7
vp9_inv_dct_dct_16x16_sub12_add_neon: 2832.4 2118.3 2266.5 1735.1
vp9_inv_dct_dct_16x16_sub16_add_neon: 3211.7 2475.3 2523.5 1983.1
vp9_inv_dct_dct_32x32_sub1_add_neon: 756.2 456.7 862.0 553.9
vp9_inv_dct_dct_32x32_sub2_add_neon: 10682.2 8190.4 8539.2 6762.5
vp9_inv_dct_dct_32x32_sub4_add_neon: 10813.5 8014.9 8518.3 6762.8
vp9_inv_dct_dct_32x32_sub8_add_neon: 11859.6 9313.0 9347.4 7514.5
vp9_inv_dct_dct_32x32_sub12_add_neon: 12946.6 10752.4 10192.2 8280.2
vp9_inv_dct_dct_32x32_sub16_add_neon: 14074.6 11946.5 11001.4 9008.6
vp9_inv_dct_dct_32x32_sub20_add_neon: 15269.9 13662.7 11816.1 9762.6
vp9_inv_dct_dct_32x32_sub24_add_neon: 16327.9 14940.1 12626.7 10516.0
vp9_inv_dct_dct_32x32_sub28_add_neon: 17462.7 15776.1 13446.2 11264.7
vp9_inv_dct_dct_32x32_sub32_add_neon: 18575.5 17157.0 14249.3 12015.1
I.e. in general a very minor overhead for the full subpartition case due
to the additional loads and cmps, but a significant speedup for the cases
when we only need to process a small part of the actual input data.
In common VP9 content in a few inspected clips, 70-90% of the non-dc-only
16x16 and 32x32 IDCTs only have nonzero coefficients in the upper left
8x8 or 16x16 subpartitions respectively.
This is cherrypicked from libav commit
9c8bc74c2b.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Additional/Modified FATE tests improve code coverage from 63.7% to 98.1%.
Changed fate-suite sample files:
* filter/hdcd-mix.flac (958K) added. It is a much better test than
filter/hdcd.flac (910K), which is now unused, but can't be removed.
* filter/hdcd-fake20bit.flac (168K) added. It is the first second of
filter/hdcd.flac, with the 16-bit LSB copied into bit 20 of a 24-bit
stream. There isn't an actual non-16-bit HDCD sample available to test.
Signed-off-by: Burt P <pburt0@gmail.com>
This would be simpler if codecpar supported AVOptions
modern ffserver should be unaffected by this, older ffserver which required the
muxer to directly access the encoder could have issues with this, but this
direct access is just wrong and unsafe
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
This accesses the private encoder context, it should not be used by
the current ffserver it may affect old ffserver versions but i believe
there is consens that accessing the private encoder context from the muxer
is completely wrong.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
They have changed due to 122190392b
Reviewed-by: "Reynaldo H. Verdejo Pinochet" <reynaldo@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
This fixes producing swf and rm files as done by ffservertest.
Reviewed-by: Reynaldo H. Verdejo Pinochet <reynaldo@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <Andreas.Cadhalpun@googlemail.com>
It randomly causes failures with an error like:
"Failed to set value '-f' for option 'd': Error number -920332800 occurred"
(The error number is different every time.)
Reviewed-by: Reynaldo H. Verdejo Pinochet <reynaldo@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <Andreas.Cadhalpun@googlemail.com>
Not doing so makes debugging unnecessarily hard.
Reviewed-by: Reynaldo H. Verdejo Pinochet <reynaldo@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <Andreas.Cadhalpun@googlemail.com>
James Almer
Paul B Mahol
Marton Balint
Michael Niedermayer
Daniil Cherednik
Martin Storsjö
Carl Eugen Hoyos
Martin Vignali
Thomas Turner
Burt P
Ronald S. Bultje
Pavel Koshevoy
Derek Buitenhuis
Wan-Teh Chang
Vittorio Giovara
Reynaldo H. Verdejo Pinochet
Andreas Cadhalpun