Since e1027aba68,
ALLOW_INTERLACED is no longer defined in h264_ps.c,
leading to a warning when encountering an SPS compatible
with MBAFF. This warning was always nonsense, because
ff_h264_decode_seq_parameter_set() is also used by the parser
and it makes no sense for the parser to warn about missing
decoder features; after all, it is not a parser's job
to warn when a feature is unsupported by a decoder
(and in this case it is even weirder, because even if the H.264
decoder is disabled, the warning will only be shown for MBAFF
sequence parameter sets). So remove the warning in h264_ps.c.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
instead of get_ue_golomb(). The difference between the two is that the
latter also has to take into account the case in which the read code is
more than 9 bits (four preceding zeroes + at most five value bits) long,
leading to more code.
Reviewed-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@gmail.com>
It represents the relationship between them more naturally and will be
useful in the following commits.
Allows significantly more frames in fate-h264-attachment-631 to be
decoded.
FMO is not supported and fields related to FMO are not parsed, meaning
that any fields which follow will be corrupt.
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Fixes: signed integer overflow: -2147483648 + -1 cannot be represented in type 'int'
Fixes: 14444/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_H264_fuzzer-5675880333967360
Found-by: continuous fuzzing process https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpeg
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Fixes: 647/clusterfuzz-testcase-5195745823031296
Found-by: continuous fuzzing process https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/targets/ffmpeg
Reviewed-by: BBB
Reviewed-by: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Fixes: signed integer overflow: 5 + 2147483646 cannot be represented in type 'int'
Fixes: 634/clusterfuzz-testcase-5285420445204480
Found-by: continuous fuzzing process https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/targets/ffmpeg
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Currently, SPS.mb_height is actually what the spec calls
PicHeightInMapUnits, which is half the frame height when interlacing is
allowed. Calling this 'mb_height' is quite confusing, and there are at
least two associated bugs where this field is treated as the actual
frame height - in the h264 parser and in the code computing maximum
reordering buffer size for a given level.
Fix those issues (and avoid possible future ones) by exporting the real
frame height in this field.
In order to be able to make SPS const in H264ParamSets,
modify decode_scaling_matrices so that it returns if the scaling
matrix are present in the SPS, instead of altering the input SPS
structure.
Make the SPS/PPS parsing independent of the H264Context, to allow
decoupling the parser from the decoder. The change is modelled after the
one done earlier for HEVC.
Move the dequant buffers to the PPS to avoid complex checks whether they
changed and an expensive copy for frame threads.
Fall back to maximum DPB size if the level is unknown.
This should be more spec-compliant and does not depend on the caller
setting has_b_frames before opening the decoder.
The old behaviour, when the delay is supplied by the caller setting
has_b_frames, can still be obtained by setting strict_std_compliance
below normal.
Fixes: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/attachment/ticket/685/movie.264
In the available testcase the actual PPS only uses a few bits
while there are 7kbyte of apparently random data after it
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
We assume an upper bound of 4096 bytes for each raw SPS/PPS. It's hard
to determine an exact maximum size, but this value was was considered
high enough and safe.
Needed for the following VideotoolBox commit.
The spec madandate both time_scale and num_units_in_tick greater than 0,
however since they are not essential for decoding, just ignore the whole
block and try to finish parsing the VUI.
Related to Ticket4445.
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giovara@gmail.com>