This is required, since invalid parameters actually could
pass the switch check below.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
A change in framesize caused a perpetual loss of synchronization.
So read (and use) the frame size from the frame header instead of
setting it only once.
Signed-off-by: Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de>
It's not our responsibility to account for other projects'
terrible hacky usage.
Also, it is no longer needed by XMBC, since 78b71d4.
Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com>
This avoids crashes when initializing the range coder for
the first slice context.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This is similar to an existing check for the second-last frame
from 062421e3.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
This avoids a potential division by zero.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Also return a proper error code.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Also pass on any returned error code.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Previously the wrong buffer pointer was checked, when buf
instead of *buf was checked. But checking the return value
instead is even better.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
If idx equaled num_coeffs - 1 on entry to the loop, the previous
check failed to break out of the loop.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
The volatile is not required here, and prevents a miscompilation with GCC
4.8.1 when building on x86 with --cpu=i686
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com>
The sample buffering logic does not take into account that the blocksize
could change. Reset the buffer if the channel configuration changes,
since if there are leftover samples, it is most likely a broken or
misconcatenated stream. This could lead to negative numbers for
missing_samples during decoding.
Thanks to Michael Niedermeyer for pointing these out.
Also don't pointlessly set the buffer size to 1 after copying
one packet.
Reported-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
CC: libav-stable@libav.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Martin Storsjö
John Stebbins
Derek Buitenhuis
Michael Niedermayer
Vittorio Giovara
Clément Bœsch
Hendrik Leppkes
Piotr Bandurski
Paul B Mahol
Christian Schmidt
Timothy Gu