refactor ff_dnxhd_get_hr_frame_size to avpriv_dnxhd_get_hr_frame_size,
to allow cross library usage in libavformat/mxfenc this change makes
this function no longer be always inlined.
Signed-off-by: Jason Stevens <jay@wizardofthenet.com>
It's a small and simple function that can be inlined.
This removes one private symbol and should reduce object dependencies with the next
major bump
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
This allows more efficient access to the array as the level and flags
are contiguous. Around 4% faster coefficient decoding.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
The MBAFF handling recently introduced on the decoder side shows that
the encoder does not support it correctly. Therefore, make the related
profile experimental.
Furthermore, current encoder logic treats it as unable to encode as
progressive, which isn't the case.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
MBAFF-like handling of interlaced content in CID 1260 is different from
the other CIDs, and in particular doesn't use the same syntax.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
These are DNxHR profiles with the following properties:
- Variable size in a profile (property added in a previous commit),
requiring variable-sized macroblock table;
- Variable bitdepth, up to 12 bits.
- Better validation of buffer sizes and positions
Signed-off-by: Christophe Gisquet <christophe.gisquet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
This a 4:4:4 10 bits profile, where image size is not fixed by the
profile, and which strays a bit outside the old frame header parsing
code.
Fixes ticket #4581 (DNxHR is not stricly supported, but that sequence is).
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Move the 'interlaced' flag to this element (arbitrarily set to 16bits).
This should allow better detection/selection of profiles.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
CID 1256 is specified as using the same table for luma and chroma,
which is the same as CID 1235 luma table. This is consistent with
the format supposedly being RGB, although most sequences seem to
actually be YCbCr-encoded.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giovara@gmail.com>
Tables 1258 and 1259 were not zigzagged when added, so it was not
possible to notice the equivalence.
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giovara@gmail.com>
Convert them to zigzag order, as the rest of them are.
When I was adding support for 10-bit DNxHD, I just copy-pasted the
missing quant matrices from the spec. Now it turns out the existing
matrices in dnxhddata.c were in zigzag order. This resulted in wrong
quantization for 10-bit DNxHD. The attached patch fixes the problem by
converting 10-bit quant matrices to zigzag order.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
CID 1256 is specified as using the same table for luma and chroma,
which is the same as CID 1235 luma table. This is consistent with
the format supposedly being RGB, although most sequences seem to
actually be YCbCr-encoded.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
CID 1260 (as evidenced by incorrect decoding of a sample from ticket
4876) seems to use incorrect weight tables. It appears those tables
were not zigzag-scanned.
Apply zigzag on weight tables for new CIDs 1258, 1259, and 1260, and
fix an incorrect chroma table for CID 1256.
Fixes last issue from ticket #4876.
Found-by: Christophe Gisquet <christophe.gisquet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Gisquet <christophe.gisquet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Despite '417792' being reported in the binary decoder, the buffer at
encoding time needs to be bigger to avoid running out of space due to
interlace handling.
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giovara@gmail.com>
Use a comment to list the reused tables, since it's more flexible than a
table name to keep information like this. The list will expand in later
commits.
Convert them to zigzag order, as the rest of them are.
When I was adding support for 10-bit DNxHD, I just copy-pasted the
missing quant matrices from the spec. Now it turns out the existing
matrices in dnxhddata.c were in zigzag order. This resulted in wrong
quantization for 10-bit DNxHD. The attached patch fixes the problem by
converting 10-bit quant matrices to zigzag order.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
These tables contain only a 1-bit flag each. Combining them reduces
the data size and saves some instructions in the block decode loop.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
This is the value actually used by the decoder in speed-critical code.
The encoder uses these tables only in init code.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Jason Stevens
Carl Eugen Hoyos
James Almer
Paul B Mahol
Mark Reid
Luca Barbato
Christophe Gisquet
Jeremy James
Joseph Artsimovich
Michael Niedermayer
Vittorio Giovara
Carl Eugen Hoyos
Kostya Shishkov
Matthieu Bouron
Michael Niedermayer
Martin Storsjö
J. Bohl
Mans Rullgard