x86/gradfun: fix compilation failure on open solaris

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
pull/59/head
Michael Niedermayer 13 years ago
parent b2527d5d5a
commit b6851d34c0
  1. 12
      libavfilter/x86/gradfun.c

@ -26,9 +26,9 @@
DECLARE_ALIGNED(16, static const uint16_t, pw_7f)[8] = {0x7F,0x7F,0x7F,0x7F,0x7F,0x7F,0x7F,0x7F};
DECLARE_ALIGNED(16, static const uint16_t, pw_ff)[8] = {0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF};
#if HAVE_MMX2
static void gradfun_filter_line_mmx2(uint8_t *dst, const uint8_t *src, const uint16_t *dc, int width, int thresh, const uint16_t *dithers)
{
#if HAVE_MMX2
intptr_t x;
if (width & 3) {
x = width & ~3;
@ -71,12 +71,12 @@ static void gradfun_filter_line_mmx2(uint8_t *dst, const uint8_t *src, const uin
"rm"(thresh), "m"(*dithers), "m"(*pw_7f)
:"memory"
);
}
#endif
}
#if HAVE_SSSE3
static void gradfun_filter_line_ssse3(uint8_t *dst, const uint8_t *src, const uint16_t *dc, int width, int thresh, const uint16_t *dithers)
{
#if HAVE_SSSE3
intptr_t x;
if (width & 7) {
// could be 10% faster if I somehow eliminated this
@ -118,12 +118,12 @@ static void gradfun_filter_line_ssse3(uint8_t *dst, const uint8_t *src, const ui
"rm"(thresh), "m"(*dithers), "m"(*pw_7f)
:"memory"
);
}
#endif // HAVE_SSSE3
}
#if HAVE_SSE
static void gradfun_blur_line_sse2(uint16_t *dc, uint16_t *buf, const uint16_t *buf1, const uint8_t *src, int src_linesize, int width)
{
#if HAVE_SSE
#define BLURV(load)\
intptr_t x = -2*width;\
__asm__ volatile(\
@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ static void gradfun_blur_line_sse2(uint16_t *dc, uint16_t *buf, const uint16_t *
} else {
BLURV("movdqa");
}
}
#endif // HAVE_SSE
}
av_cold void ff_gradfun_init_x86(GradFunContext *gf)
{

Loading…
Cancel
Save