wmaprodec: tighter check for num_vec_coeffs

Found-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
pull/30/merge
Michael Niedermayer 13 years ago
parent c047afb80c
commit b21ba20cc8
  1. 3
      libavcodec/wmaprodec.c

@ -1166,6 +1166,7 @@ static int decode_subframe(WMAProDecodeCtx *s)
transmit_coeffs = 1;
}
av_assert0(s->subframe_len <= WMAPRO_BLOCK_MAX_SIZE);
if (transmit_coeffs) {
int step;
int quant_step = 90 * s->bits_per_sample >> 4;
@ -1176,7 +1177,7 @@ static int decode_subframe(WMAProDecodeCtx *s)
for (i = 0; i < s->channels_for_cur_subframe; i++) {
int c = s->channel_indexes_for_cur_subframe[i];
int num_vec_coeffs = get_bits(&s->gb, num_bits) << 2;
if (num_vec_coeffs > WMAPRO_BLOCK_MAX_SIZE) {
if (num_vec_coeffs > s->subframe_len) {
av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "num_vec_coeffs %d is too large\n", num_vec_coeffs);
return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
}

Loading…
Cancel
Save