From dc3e12d1cb65d74fb120197ce869a205718b6715 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Derek Buitenhuis Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 13:24:06 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Mention zzuf in the fuzz testing section It's pretty much the best tool for the job, and it's what we all use now anyway. Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis --- doc/developer.texi | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi index f374614463..c10d44a2c0 100644 --- a/doc/developer.texi +++ b/doc/developer.texi @@ -451,7 +451,8 @@ send a reminder by email. Your patch should eventually be dealt with. other security issues? @item Did you test your decoder or demuxer against damaged data? If no, see - tools/trasher and the noise bitstream filter. Your decoder or demuxer + tools/trasher, the noise bitstream filter, and + @uref{http://caca.zoy.org/wiki/zzuf, zzuf}. Your decoder or demuxer should not crash or end in a (near) infinite loop when fed damaged data. @item Does the patch not mix functional and cosmetic changes?