From 21c65125424ef3dd7e276dea14f8e8ef3292e388 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 13:44:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: remove MUL64 and MAC64 inline asm

Current GCC versions know how to generate these instructions
properly and avoiding inline asm gives better code.  The MULH
function for ARMv5 uses the same instruction and is also not
needed any more.

The MLS64 macro remains since negating an input would normally
not be allowed as it would fail for INT_MIN.  In our uses, the
inputs never have this value and thus negating is safe.

Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
---
 libavcodec/arm/mathops.h | 31 +------------------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libavcodec/arm/mathops.h b/libavcodec/arm/mathops.h
index 3870fce3e2..b27b18f871 100644
--- a/libavcodec/arm/mathops.h
+++ b/libavcodec/arm/mathops.h
@@ -28,45 +28,16 @@
 
 #if HAVE_INLINE_ASM
 
-#define MULH MULH
-#define MUL64 MUL64
-
 #if HAVE_ARMV6
+#define MULH MULH
 static inline av_const int MULH(int a, int b)
 {
     int r;
     __asm__ ("smmul %0, %1, %2" : "=r"(r) : "r"(a), "r"(b));
     return r;
 }
-
-static inline av_const int64_t MUL64(int a, int b)
-{
-    int64_t x;
-    __asm__ ("smull %Q0, %R0, %1, %2" : "=r"(x) : "r"(a), "r"(b));
-    return x;
-}
-#else
-static inline av_const int MULH(int a, int b)
-{
-    int lo, hi;
-    __asm__ ("smull %0, %1, %2, %3" : "=&r"(lo), "=&r"(hi) : "r"(b), "r"(a));
-    return hi;
-}
-
-static inline av_const int64_t MUL64(int a, int b)
-{
-    int64_t x;
-    __asm__ ("smull %Q0, %R0, %1, %2" : "=&r"(x) : "r"(a), "r"(b));
-    return x;
-}
 #endif
 
-static inline av_const int64_t MAC64(int64_t d, int a, int b)
-{
-    __asm__ ("smlal %Q0, %R0, %1, %2" : "+r"(d) : "r"(a), "r"(b));
-    return d;
-}
-#define MAC64(d, a, b) ((d) = MAC64(d, a, b))
 #define MLS64(d, a, b) MAC64(d, -(a), b)
 
 #if HAVE_ARMV5TE