|
|
|
|
Google Summer of Code and similar project guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summer of Code is a project by Google in which students are paid to implement
|
|
|
|
|
some nice new features for various participating open source projects ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This text is a collection of things to take care of for the next soc as
|
|
|
|
|
it's a little late for this year's soc (2006).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Goal:
|
|
|
|
|
Our goal in respect to soc is and must be of course exactly one thing and
|
|
|
|
|
that is to improve FFmpeg, to reach this goal, code must
|
|
|
|
|
* conform to the development policy and patch submission guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
* must improve FFmpeg somehow (faster, smaller, "better",
|
|
|
|
|
more codecs supported, fewer bugs, cleaner, ...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for mentors and other developers to help students to reach that goal it is
|
|
|
|
|
essential that changes to their codebase are publicly visible, clean and
|
|
|
|
|
easy reviewable that again leads us to:
|
|
|
|
|
* use of a revision control system like git
|
|
|
|
|
* separation of cosmetic from non-cosmetic changes (this is almost entirely
|
|
|
|
|
ignored by mentors and students in soc 2006 which might lead to a suprise
|
|
|
|
|
when the code will be reviewed at the end before a possible inclusion in
|
|
|
|
|
FFmpeg, individual changes were generally not reviewable due to cosmetics).
|
|
|
|
|
* frequent commits, so that comments can be provided early
|
